Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
k1m
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
42 ms
·
1.
▲
We have to build AI that murders us
(twitter.com)
3 points
by
k1m
7d ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
Show HN: Crossposter – open-source browser extension for social media posting
(crossposter.mochi.is)
1 points
by
k1m
8d ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
by
k1m
15d ago
It reduces diversity, which they don't talk about much. Wrote about it here. https://blog.keyvan.net/p/ai-text-watermarking-and-quality
4.
▲
by
k1m
21d ago
Agree. I think many people forget that not long ago, HTML markup on many sites was a lot richer than it is today. Making it trivial to produce a good trimmed down markdown version. The reason it may be more difficult today is because we
5.
▲
by
k1m
21d ago
In general I think I just don't like the idea of one URL being able to return different content. Forces me to think about what each system I give that URL to may be sending in content negotiation headers. Would rather the HTML is retur
6.
▲
by
k1m
21d ago
Thanks. I posted that comment before they had added support - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48353325 - didn't know situation had changed. But it's something I think developers should think about if they rel
7.
▲
by
k1m
21d ago
I agree. I think a lot of people here are assuming that the full HTML retrieved has to go into the LLM eating up tokens. But why wouldn't the agent try to clean up first and remove bloat and convert to markdown itself, before feeding i
8.
▲
by
k1m
21d ago
I agree with Roy Fielding on this: > It is a bad design trade-off to send a bunch of header fields on every request just to tell the server all of the possible variations of preference held by the user, particularly when there is a very
9.
▲
AI text watermarking and quality loss
(blog.keyvan.net)
2 points
by
k1m
22d ago
|
0 comments
10.
▲
AI text watermarking and quality loss
(blog.keyvan.net)
3 points
by
k1m
23d ago
|
0 comments
11.
▲
AI stigma punishes legitimate use
(blog.keyvan.net)
1 points
by
k1m
24d ago
|
0 comments
12.
▲
by
k1m
29d ago
I don't know enough about models that produce images, music, video to know how much human thinking and creativity can shape their output. But with text, the kind of output you get from a simple throwaway prompt like 'write me an e
13.
▲
by
k1m
29d ago
> this is only about machine-generated works that are trying to pass as human works. But by "machine-generated" don't you mean "text that came out of an AI model"? My argument in the post is that such output tell
14.
▲
AI detectors are a bad idea
(blog.keyvan.net)
3 points
by
k1m
29d ago
|
4 comments
15.
▲
Text Watermarking: How It Works
(watermarking.mochi.is)
4 points
by
k1m
1mo ago
|
0 comments
16.
▲
by
k1m
1mo ago
That's an interesting idea to try as a browser extension. I think Facebook is particularly egregious here, so I doubt you'd need to run something like this on other sites. But if it worked fast enough on just Facebook, it would be
17.
▲
by
k1m
1mo ago
This reminded me of an old documentary about corporations: "If we look at the corporation as a legal person, it exhibits all the characteristics of a psychopath" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5hEiANG4Uk
18.
▲
by
k1m
3mo ago
I personally have no insight into what they have or haven't dismantled. Just found the article interesting (had never heard of the company). Was responding to the "They seized the wrong domain" claim in the tweet you quoted.
19.
▲
by
k1m
3mo ago
NearlyFreeSpeech.NET: https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net/about/
20.
▲
by
k1m
3mo ago
Google shows netnut.com[1] being the same thing, so not sure it's the wrong domain. Maybe not the main one. Brian Krebs' comment on this[2]: > Pretty sure they're working on getting that domain too, but it's taking lo
21.
▲
FBI Seizes NetNut Proxy Platform, Popa Botnet
(krebsonsecurity.com)
44 points
by
k1m
3mo ago
|
16 comments
22.
▲
by
k1m
3mo ago
This article, as with many like it, ignores the fact that trust in "traditional media" is at an all time low globally. That's not because people enjoy fake news on social media, it's because traditional media has failed
23.
▲
by
k1m
3mo ago
> I think many people in tech have existed in a high-demand labor market for so long that they have no idea how much less other job markets reward people for their intelligence, work ethic, knowledge, education, etc. Absolutely! It'
24.
▲
by
k1m
3mo ago
> The fundamental flaw in all these style arguments against core employment is people's personal desire to have a straight forward path for survival that doesn't involve a lot of strategic thought. One of the most popular alter
25.
▲
by
k1m
3mo ago
I'm not in the camp that believes AI is actually going to reach human intelligence. So yes, AI is simply dumb. But many people overlook the fact that many of our jobs today require exactly that level of dumbness. So saying AI is dumb d
26.
▲
by
k1m
3mo ago
My post focused more on trying to question why we value jobs so much, beyond the paychecks they offer. I didn't get into alternatives, but Universal Basic Income (UBI) is what you'll see discussed most often as an alternative. I&#
27.
▲
by
k1m
3mo ago
On your first point, I agree with you that it's a deeply held belief. But that doesn't make it reasonable. That's why I think it's worth the effort trying to question it, especially at a time when there's so much di
28.
▲
by
k1m
3mo ago
> There is no future in which they willingly submit to the kind of redistribution that would be required to finance a society where work is optional. Do they ever willingly submit to anything that results in less money for them? Too earl
29.
▲
by
k1m
3mo ago
> because jobs are fucking important and necessary Why are they important and necessary, and for whom?
30.
▲
by
k1m
3mo ago
I agree, but I think it's a shame that this purpose to life is tied to jobs. It's understandable, because pretty much everyone's path in life is schooling, then a job. So the job becomes our purpose and identity. Job loss can
More ›