Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
justin101
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
1.
▲
by
justin101
3y ago
I am curious about the legality of this. I guess I assumed that doing this type of thing would technically a DCMA type breech? So this makes me wonder if my assumption wrong? How does this work legally?
2.
▲
by
justin101
3y ago
The serverless name is unhelpful. What these companies really mean by serverless is: "your code that handles HTTP requests must be able to startup, run, and shutdown effectively instantly" aka "serve your HTTP without bloated
3.
▲
by
justin101
3y ago
GCP's max instance count is helpful to a certain extent, but this doesn't completely protect you unless from DDOS attacks. If you have 3 nodes that can all handle 1000 requests per second, and those requests are doing something ex
4.
▲
by
justin101
3y ago
I enjoyed Google's GCP for quite a long time until they removed the ability to cap expenses with a budget limit. (It used to be that if you hit your budget limit you can make your site error out). Now everyone on GCP is one DDOS away f
5.
▲
by
justin101
3y ago
Youtube has a sense of humor and hardcodes this video about "videos that have 301 views" to have 301 views.
6.
▲
YouTube hardcodes a video to have 301 views
(youtube.com)
2 points
by
justin101
3y ago
|
1 comments
7.
▲
by
justin101
3y ago
I doubt that applies if they have a court order or request from the FBI to block certain domain names or links. If you had a court order or "request for cooperation" from the FBI to block that domain name, would you do it?
8.
▲
by
justin101
3y ago
Irrespective of this is right or wrong, the concern of the lawyers at google would not be "If Google _should_ be held accountable for the private activity of users", the concern of the lawyers will always be "what _could_ the
9.
▲
by
justin101
3y ago
I am as horrified as you probably are, but Google is quite possibly not allowed (by law) to share certain links. Even if technically allowed, their lawyers would likely not let them participate or facilitate sharing links to sites that woul
10.
▲
by
justin101
3y ago
Not being from the US, this is probably a stupid question. But why can't people in the US sell willingly and freely sell things (legitimate or otherwise) to other willing buyers without government interference/participation? I gue
11.
▲
by
justin101
3y ago
Where does one even go about finding 12Gb of pure latin text?
12.
▲
by
justin101
3y ago
Yes, but no one can say that. Managers need to go off on project management, team management, and all sorts of other scenic hotel retreats to learn how to use JIRA better because of course the fault is JIRA and the underlings.
13.
▲
by
justin101
3y ago
There are a number of reasons this could be that are not necessarily nefarious. It's odd to jump straight to "something evil is going on" Tell me this, does Twitter have some kind of "play nice" code that slows down