junon

5 ms·

1.
by junon 7d ago
Finally.
2.
by junon 10d ago
Attorneys can subpoena if the court approves, as part of ongoing litigation, AFAIU (IANAL).
3.
by junon 10d ago
Not sure I'd read it as-written. But I'd love a statistics book whereby the chapters are real case studies. I personally learn best when I can apply new theory to a tangible problem (not just an example problem that's been re
4.
by junon 10d ago
[flagged]
5.
by junon 10d ago
Perhaps understanding why it exists is a good start, as opposed to flinging childish language around.
6.
by junon 13d ago
So even after the intense backlash Tantacrul saw on the GH threads, they went ahead and stuffed it full of telemetry anyway. Incredible.
7.
by junon 14d ago
It's an LLM bot user.
8.
by junon 15d ago
I've met you (Steve) and hung out with him for a few hours after oxidize. He's none of those things, and in fact was one of the most pleasant people I've met at conferences. So not only are they brazen and vulgar allegations
9.
by junon 16d ago
Also no need to install or commit to a guild or clan or whatever. You could just log in, screw around for an hour or ten, and log off. Then log in again from somewhere else. It was miraculous for a kid like me.
10.
by junon 16d ago
Kernel dev here (my own project): ARM is great. Love it. There are tons of chips that all do things differently, much more so than x86. Plus the booting mechanisms are a PITA to figure out, debugging is tricky, etc - and that's a singl
11.
by junon 16d ago
I believe spetz is on the project, so I'd like to ask: Is this a MQ implementation, or can this be used in place of e.g. something like protobufs and iroh/tonic? Does it have something akin to grants/capabilities/authori
12.
by junon 19d ago
Not sure if you're just trolling or what but your comment is demonstrably false and very easily disproven at that
13.
by junon 19d ago
This still makes my blood boil. Even then people didn't seem to care (maybe they didn't understand) and we're all collectively just going along with it.
14.
by junon 23d ago
More on the frustration: this person with no real world experience is hired and all of a sudden sending me six page articles they themselves couldn't fathom writing and they're lauded by founders and celebrated as pioneers of the
15.
by junon 23d ago
I don't even know what "best" looks like, tbh. I also have some family not particularly happy (putting it nicely) with how my uncle handled it. I personally think he's a saint; views differ but there's no Right Way,
16.
by junon 23d ago
Just lost my aunt to Alzheimer's this last week. +1 on the hard to take care of bit. They turn into toddlers, then animals, then nothing. It's heartbreaking.
17.
by junon 25d ago
This is music to my ears. Going to try this now.
18.
by junon 25d ago
It's not your intent to use a tool that can cause real world damage, to actually do such damage. It was your negligence in that case. A different legal concept than intent .
19.
by junon 25d ago
This looks like a tool from Cowboy Bebop.
20.
by junon 26d ago
Yes, which is the grey area. "Can / might do" vs "they trained it to do that explicitly" is, I believe, the grey area - whether or not they're the same thing. Intent matters for a lot of this - and "intent
21.
by junon 1mo ago
<Summary>. <Short interjection>. That's their whole schitck. If you're going to dilute the community with AI slop at least make it interesting.
22.
by junon 1mo ago
What a fascinatingly misguided dismissal of someone actually doing something to back up their words.
23.
by junon 2mo ago
Where do you think AI got its training material? Was it not from those very same "engineers of lore" and their respective "tech crap"?
24.
by junon 2mo ago
It's pretty common from where I sit, tbh.
25.
by junon 2mo ago
It's also one of the most aggravating database systems I've worked with.
26.
by junon 2mo ago
I wasn't saying you were, I was saying you were responding to an LLM.
27.
by junon 2mo ago
You're not a fringe user, a ton of people use old reddit (myself included). They're killing themselves the same way Tumblr did. Oh well.
28.
by junon 2mo ago
> I know that SIMD doesn't imply particular instruction set but a pattern of concurrent data transformation. Eh. It's both. You don't have one without the other. SIMD is pretty much entirely extensions to base processor IS
29.
by junon 2mo ago
Parent comment is an LLM by the way.
30.
by junon 2mo ago
You're conflating "what's illegal" with "what a private entity doesn't want". I don't like it any more than you do, but the first is very clear, the second is a bit harder to "solve".

More ›