juliobbv

6 ms·

1.
by juliobbv 21d ago
Dude... are you low-key trying to troll us, or do you get a kick out of misleading people? How can you manage to be confidently wrong this much? It saddens me to see this kind of slop written on HN of all places, and to not have it even que
2.
by juliobbv 3mo ago
You can adjust how much "effort" the avif encoder puts on images. The default speed in libavif (-s 6 in avifenc) is fast enough, and it has been used by big CDNs to encode AVIFs for years. You can make the encoder as fast or slow
3.
by juliobbv 7mo ago
Especially when the a big subset of adults misunderstand of the actual scope of what "nsfw" actually consists of, and unfortunately the lgbt space isn't immune to such harmful perspectives. I've been noticing people in t
4.
by juliobbv 1y ago
> AVIF is better at low to medium quality, and JXL is better at medium to high quality. BTW, this is no longer true. With the introduction of tune IQ (Image Quality) to libaom and SVT-AV1, AVIF can be competitive with (and oftentimes bea
5.
Show HN: AvifHash v0 – Compact and efficient image placeholders(juliobbv.com)
8 points by juliobbv 2y ago|0 comments
6.
by juliobbv 2y ago
Sounds good! Let me know if you have any questions about SVT-AV1-PSY (I'm a developer). You can check if deltaq is being used in pictures, by opening the AVIFs in aomanalyzer ( https://pengbins.github.io/aomanalyzer.io&#
7.
by juliobbv 2y ago
This is cool stuff! BTW, I see that you're using `avifenc` with `aomenc` to encode AVIF, so there are few suggestions that overall increase image quality per size: - `deltaq-mode=2` or `deltaq-mode=3` each enable different flavors of v