julienwaj

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by julienwaj 2y ago

   Can you please elaborate on that?
2. 2.▲
   by julienwaj 3y ago

   This _already_ proved effective, as outlined in this post: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2023/10/down-and-to-the-right-fire... Of course website authors should also do their part :-)
3. 3.▲
   by julienwaj 3y ago

   15 is quite correct, definitely not horrible, so don't worry too much about that. It's not a rating, more a way to compare how browsers and hardware improve over time. The scale goes up to 140 so that there's some space for s
4. 4.▲
   by julienwaj 3y ago

   Can you please file a bug in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Core&comp... , and fill in some of the information in the template? Thanks!
5. 5.▲
   by julienwaj 3y ago

   The score goes from 0 to 140 so that there's some room for when the computers will get faster. When we started working on this, all browsers were maxed at 140, so the computation got changed.
6. 6.▲
   by julienwaj 3y ago

   If the analogy isn't working for you, you can see the actual durations when you click on "Details".
7. 7.▲
   by julienwaj 3y ago

   Please file a bug there if necessary => https://github.com/WebKit/Speedometer/issues/new :-)
8. 8.▲
   by julienwaj 3y ago

   Do you see anything (errors or something else) in the web console?