jujube3

8 ms·

1.
by jujube3 8d ago
We're running out of math. Maybe the president needs to establish a Strategic Math Reserve.
2.
by jujube3 12d ago
The article literally says "the new programs mash up work done by human minds." Implying that they are not doing any real work of their own, just "mashing up" work done by humans.
3.
by jujube3 12d ago
Check back in a few decades, and he'll have added some more.
4.
by jujube3 15d ago
This seems to be a very typical fallacy. "AI is just a collection of stuff people made." No. The Internet was that. AI is something that was TRAINED on stuff people made. So are you. The logical outcome of this fallacy is believin
5.
by jujube3 18d ago
Is he... a goer...eh? Know what I mean? Know what I mean? Does he go?
6.
by jujube3 21d ago
Maybe work on a larger font size, pal.
7.
by jujube3 26d ago
The answer to his question is "yes." If the book isn't destroyed, it becomes a liability to Anthropic, because then it's no longer format-shifting.
8.
by jujube3 28d ago
As far as I know, if humans are having a discussion about the structure of the code and deliberately making changes (such as in github or on a forum) that represents human creativity. If you hit a button and then make literally no changes t
9.
by jujube3 28d ago
Company A: You stole our code >:( Company B: Can you tell us which part we stole? Company A: You can safely assume that nearly every PR had human input, unless you have a way to prove otherwise. In any case we can prove that you illegall
10.
by jujube3 28d ago
I've explained this many times. LLMs don't "copy original work." ChatGPT doesn't contain copies of books inside it, any more than your brain is a copy of the various books you have read. The LLM model isn't phy
11.
by jujube3 29d ago
The whole job of a Wikipedia author is to take source material and reword and summarize it into an article. They're essentially acting as human LLMs. Wikipedia even has very specific rules against "original research." You are
12.
by jujube3 29d ago
Yes, Wikipedia gets its content largely by hovering up the web, without the consent of the authors. For example you can cite a New York Times article in Wikipedia, without getting the consent of the NYT author. Wikipedia also "hoovers
13.
by jujube3 29d ago
Sure, I'll remind you. The most popular encyclopedia of our time, Wikipedia, doesn't pay most of its contributors (I think they do have some administrative staff or something?). Nor do they pay journalists or authors for the artic
14.
by jujube3 29d ago
Even assuming that AI code can't be copyrighted by the person running the AI (seems like a stretch), the company just needs to prove that someone, at some point, made a direct modification to the code not through the AI. It only takes
15.
by jujube3 1mo ago
Grok lobster! (Rock lobster music starts playing)
16.
by jujube3 1mo ago
He's implying that other projects in the Linux ecosystem have banned AI. Which is mostly untrue, but I'm sure there's at least one out there.
17.
by jujube3 1mo ago
Linux has not said "no AI contributions or repos". In fact Linux has a policy explicitly allowing AI.
18.
by jujube3 1mo ago
If it was filed in 2008, wouldn't the patent have expired in 2028 anyway? Or am I missing something?
19.
by jujube3 1mo ago
Saying that you can't copy something is different from saying that it is illegal to read it. For example, it is legal for me to read Ray Bradbury's book, "Fahrenheit 451" when I check it out from the library. It is n
20.
by jujube3 1mo ago
Making your code open source was consenting to have people (and AIs) read it and learn from it. As an open source developer myself, I always understood that.
21.
by jujube3 1mo ago
Homeless people who live in the sewers. But first, you have to learn karate.
22.
by jujube3 2mo ago
Claude, build me a game engine. Make no mistakes.
23.
by jujube3 2mo ago
You know. Clem. I've said too much already!
24.
by jujube3 2mo ago
2025 is 10 years ago in AI time.
25.
by jujube3 2mo ago
Generally following the law in the country you're located in is not considered a highly political act.
26.
by jujube3 2mo ago
Are people really not aware that you have to wash your solar panels every few months? Your installer should have told you that much.
27.
by jujube3 2mo ago
Removing malware or illegal content is very different than removing things for political reasons.
28.
by jujube3 2mo ago
Codeberg did make such a rule. Their announcement explicitly says that "Projects heavily tied to the LLM ecosytem" are "no longer [...] welcome on Codeberg". The code for an AI agent would definitely fall into that categ
29.
by jujube3 2mo ago
A lot of hardware literally has appreciated in the last year or two.
30.
by jujube3 2mo ago
The eZ80 is still manufactured even though the original Z80 is not.

More ›