juanfont

7 ms·

1.
by juanfont 1y ago
Headscale creator here. > Fun fact: Tailscale have an almost-assuredly-accurate count of Headscale users due to how few people disable the Tailscale client's telemetry which by default sends them real-time events about everything yo
2.
by juanfont 3y ago
We have definitely improved a lot the stability and test coverage in the last year. Really, really a lot. Still a bit to go, but overall there have been many changes :) But indeed we are not meant to replace the full frictionless experience
3.
by juanfont 3y ago
Ah, I was not stating anything else than linking their blog post :) I am pretty sure they would have eventually published a control server. We just happened to be quicker (and come up with a great name, IMHO).
4.
by juanfont 3y ago
> even though I understand that it is (unofficially?) supported by Tailscale these days. https://tailscale.com/blog/opensource/
5.
by juanfont 3y ago
Headscale dev here! What issues did you face? :)
6.
by juanfont 3y ago
Or they would not be supporting the development of Headscale.
7.
by juanfont 3y ago
Yes?
8.
by juanfont 5y ago
And it's fully supported by Headscale.
9.
by juanfont 5y ago
It was the only possible one really.
10.
by juanfont 5y ago
Headscale dev here. Companies looking into this will pay Tailscale.com service. You really need commercial support if you plan a large enterprise deployment. Tailscale even now offers a self-hosted version of their service - for those with
11.
by juanfont 5y ago
We do have support for separate namespaces/tailnets, and we will be adding ACLs soon... PRs welcome :)
12.
by juanfont 5y ago
Yup. Btw, there is no IdP support in Headscale. You need to have access to the machine where you are running it, and use the CLI to register your machines (or use a authkey, ofc).
13.
by juanfont 12y ago
Cool.