Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jtlicardo
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
1.
▲
by
jtlicardo
1y ago
The fact that I cannot "unlike" the post at the bottom of the page is mildly infuriating.
2.
▲
Self-attention mechanism explained
(jtlicardo.com)
1 points
by
jtlicardo
1y ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
by
jtlicardo
1y ago
At this point, I wonder how long software engineers will keep convincing themselves they’re irreplaceable
4.
▲
A practical guide to building agents [pdf]
(cdn.openai.com)
2 points
by
jtlicardo
1y ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
by
jtlicardo
2y ago
The insurance analogy doesn't work - programming skills exist on a spectrum of daily relevance. Insurance becomes relevant in rare emergencies. Programming skills are becoming less relevant in day-to-day. What I pointed out in my post
6.
▲
by
jtlicardo
2y ago
LLMs have already improved sufficiently that people are worried their programming skills are decaying, debugging skills included (based on the article I referenced). I'm curious to see how you envision LLMs improving without this not b
7.
▲
by
jtlicardo
2y ago
I agree that you still need programming skills (today, at least). Yet people are using those programming skills less and less, as you can clearly see in the article [1] I referenced. You are also making the assumption that LLMs won't i
8.
▲
by
jtlicardo
2y ago
My post did not take the position that understanding problems isn't important. Using LLMs can even help you understand the problem better. And it can bring you towards the solution faster. Using an LLM to solve a problem does not preve
9.
▲
by
jtlicardo
2y ago
The trajectory of LLMs "routinely producing incorrect results" is heading downwards as we are getting more advanced reasoning models with test-time compute. I don't know whether you used some of the more recent models like Cl
10.
▲
by
jtlicardo
2y ago
You make a good point and those kind of senior engineer skills may be the least affected. My post does not argue against that. It argues that writing code manually may quickly become obsolete. What I am trying to say is that people who see
11.
▲
Programmers are modern-day computers
(jtlicardo.com)
20 points
by
jtlicardo
2y ago
|
45 comments
12.
▲
by
jtlicardo
3y ago
People who consciously do IF tend to eat healthier, while people who skip breakfast purely because they're lazy tend to eat less healthy food. I don't believe that eating time affects anything. Our caveman ancestors did not eat m
13.
▲
US Army Field Manual on Leadership (1990) [pdf]
(armyoe.files.wordpress.com)
224 points
by
jtlicardo
3y ago
|
120 comments
14.
▲
by
jtlicardo
3y ago
It works with this prompt. I guess you have to explicitly state you want it to search the web.
15.
▲
by
jtlicardo
3y ago
Asked it if it could search the web and it said yes. Followed up with "Can you tell me the latest news from Ukraine?" and it responded with "I'm sorry, but I'm a language model and I can't do that"
16.
▲
by
jtlicardo
3y ago
> But most apps make this surprisingly hard... Not sure about other apps, but Google Keep makes it pretty damn simple and efficient
17.
▲
by
jtlicardo
3y ago
You pretty much summed up the drawbacks of the embeddings approach. In my experience it's pretty hard to extract the relevant parts of text, especially when the text is uniform.
18.
▲
by
jtlicardo
3y ago
This is great. When do you plan to release the Android version?
19.
▲
by
jtlicardo
3y ago
Makes sense.
20.
▲
by
jtlicardo
3y ago
This may be a silly question, but I'm not quite getting what all the fuss is about. Let's say your current username is abc#1234. When you get prompted to change your username, you will be able to change it to @abc#1234. You can st