jryle70

5 ms·

1.
by jryle70 5d ago
HN crowd criticize social media for algorithmic feeds. They are proud that HN is more organic. Now they want exactly that when they don't like what they see?
2.
by jryle70 5d ago
> It's important to be able to read through PR in planted pieces Planted pieces? how about directly from the operator: Without the lifetime extension investment program, the plant – which currently employs approximately 580 people
3.
by jryle70 5d ago
> “Job-creating infrastructure” would be infrastructure that creates jobs. A chamber of commerce, small business lenders, startup accelerators etc. Such a bizarre logic. Since when a chamber of commerce or startup accelerators are infras
4.
by jryle70 5d ago
> No public money needed, it is easily profitable to do without. According to whom? Show the number, don't just be hand wavy. If it is struggling now to extend beyond 2030 then how can it easily be profitable? Think about your logic
5.
by jryle70 6d ago
First of all, are you willing to wait to find out? Second of all, if it is not Google, it'd be either other businesses, or from tax money. Why should tax money be used to bail out a failed business?
6.
by jryle70 6d ago
The question is how much they buy. It may not be enough to keep the plant running. Google will only buy up to 50% of what the plant can produce, but the deal allows the plant to operate beyond 2030 according to the operator. Side note: Real
7.
by jryle70 6d ago
> Calling data centers “job creating infrastructure” seems like a bit of an oxymoron That's your original point, which is wrong since, as you admitted, data center boom is clearly creating jobs. If you meant those jobs are offset by
8.
by jryle70 6d ago
Do you know the specific of which countries buying how much electricity from this plant, or just your wildly guess?
9.
by jryle70 6d ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49652346
10.
by jryle70 6d ago
> they’re displacing previous nuclear power users onto dirtier They are not. The plant may not survive beyond 2030 without this order.
11.
by jryle70 6d ago
The plant may be closed without this Google's order. The cost to keep it running is substantial. I guess that's what you prefer? "The Finland deal will ensure that the Loviisa plant keeps operating beyond 2030, the companies
12.
by jryle70 6d ago
You sound like an OpenAI's competitor. (Just a faintest, without any clue, completely baseless suspicion on my end, just like what you did)
13.
by jryle70 7d ago
The whole thread without a single technical post about the significance (or not) of the announcement. Who want to follow me to create a new site that focus on the substance of the news? I'm not abandoning HN, I can come back here to ma
14.
by jryle70 7d ago
Do human drivers in the same "good weather" cities have fewer accidents than human in other places?
15.
by jryle70 7d ago
Can you link to those reports? How reputable are the investigators? Financial market has great incentive to stay informed. Those 401ks are their bread and butter customers, and not every bank/fund is Meta's co-conspirator in its s
16.
by jryle70 8d ago
It was next to the other piece, for at least 8 hrs.
17.
by jryle70 8d ago
Ah, "Americans are awful. Now we can be just awful" > they also call for banning Chinese models and open weights models... So I guess Anthropic called for banning Chinese models when they said "but let me state it clearly
18.
by jryle70 9d ago
Capitalism at its finest! Or wait, never mind
19.
by jryle70 9d ago
> IBM write all this breathless marketing copy that seems detached from the actual utility of the device What are the actual utility according to IBM? Did they say you can order one today on their website? Or even "call us to get th
20.
by jryle70 9d ago
They also totally don't care bout Chinese companies, they use those products because there are really no alternatives. Apple and Samsung (reluctantly) comply. I guess we know which other companies don't?
21.
by jryle70 9d ago
When news doesn't confirm my belief, doubt it and make sure people know. Trust me I do the same.
22.
by jryle70 9d ago
First of all, cite them. Second of all, on which time scale, are they both talking about the near, mid or long terms?
23.
by jryle70 9d ago
It's handy-wavy because nobody knows how it will turn out and which new jobs will be created. In the same way as every predictions about AI bust, job lost, moat (or lack of it) is. If you feel confident about your predictions, don&#x2
24.
by jryle70 10d ago
No it isn't true. I'm saying so. Is what I said objectively true?
25.
by jryle70 10d ago
I'm way more articulated now than I've ever been, because in the past I didn't have to -- I never write a blog post -- but I've learned that well thought-out writing, with clear description, will produce better code. The
26.
by jryle70 13d ago
That's the challenge of defining intelligence. What is intelligence? Do you want to take a stab at defining/quantifying it? I'm s afraid anything specific you can come up with will also be useless.
27.
by jryle70 13d ago
So both can coexist? what's the issue? Why does HN waste energy on pointless pissing contests?
28.
by jryle70 14d ago
An aviation thread with two utterly ignorant posts - [0]. Is that the aviation knowledge level of HN? [0] - this one and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49541946
29.
by jryle70 14d ago
Why don't you try to do it yourself with Fable and compare it with this one? Even with AI there are still a lot of work, knowledge, and gotchas involved. What's the point of such comment?
30.
by jryle70 15d ago
That's wrong. US battery energy is growing faster than ever, not in small part thanks to the push by data centers. https://www.siliconvalley.com/2026/09/01/us-battery-installs...

More ›