Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jrvidal
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
jrvidal
2y ago
I think you are trying very hard to disagree on basic stuff that works very similarly across different language ecosystems, and (looking at other responses) that you're very angry. Disengaging.
2.
▲
by
jrvidal
2y ago
The Rust compiler/language has no notion of semver. Saying "Rust is unstable b/c semver blah blah" is a tad imprecise. Semver only matters in the context of judging API changes of a certain library (crate). > The onl
3.
▲
by
jrvidal
2y ago
I think we're mixing 2 things here: language backward-compatibility, vs. standard practices about what semver means for Rust libraries. The former is way stronger than the latter.
4.
▲
by
jrvidal
2y ago
I think the precise pre-condition is that the theory should be recursive, which means either a finite list of axioms _or_ a computable check to determine whether a given formula is an axiom.
5.
▲
by
jrvidal
2y ago
As other top-level comment indicates, this is debatable: https://github.com/xorvoid/meson-brainfuck/issues/1
6.
▲
by
jrvidal
3y ago
I kinda recall some comments by pcwalton about APIs that would ameliorate context-switching costs at the kernel level: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
7.
▲
by
jrvidal
4y ago
I see, it seems we misread each other.
8.
▲
by
jrvidal
4y ago
> The "working group" is some people on Discord Fair enough, we should correct our mention of WebDriver BiDi to "tentative standard". BTW, not sure if you hold some grudge against WebDriver BiDi in particular, we were
9.
▲
by
jrvidal
4y ago
> Firefox has added support for some webdriver APIs[1] that this proprietary "WebContainers" product depends on Hi, WebContainers does not depend on WebDriver BiDi. We did mention our interest in this new standard getting more
10.
▲
by
jrvidal
4y ago
hi HN, there's a companion technical post by yours truly which might be more appropriate/technically dense for your taste: https://blog.stackblitz.com/posts/supporting-firefox/ (I'm also sad that Mu
11.
▲
by
jrvidal
5y ago
Stackblitz | Full-time | REMOTE, US, EU timezones | https://stackblitz.com/careers We're building the fastest, most secure IDE on the planet! We recently announced WebContainer ( https://blog.stackblitz.com&#
12.
▲
by
jrvidal
5y ago
Stackblitz | Full-time | REMOTE, US, EU timezones | https://stackblitz.com/careers We're building the fastest, most secure IDE on the planet! We recently announced WebContainer ( https://blog.stackblitz.com&
13.
▲
by
jrvidal
5y ago
Stackblitz | Full-time | REMOTE, US, EU timezones | https://stackblitz.com/careers We're building the fastest, most secure IDE on the planet! We recently announced WebContainer ( https://blog.stackblitz.com&#
14.
▲
by
jrvidal
5y ago
Stackblitz | Full-time | REMOTE, US, EU timezones | https://stackblitz.com/careers We're building the fastest, most secure IDE on the planet! We recently announced WebContainers ( https://blog.stackblitz.com&
15.
▲
by
jrvidal
6y ago
I replied in a sibling, but anyways: I mean, I can also see that _on paper_, but by the same reasoning, MS would have never thrown away their engine.
16.
▲
by
jrvidal
6y ago
As I said, I'd like that to happen, but I don't see MS being bothered by diverging priorities enough to fork after _throwing away_ a whole engine to avoid duplicating work. At least not in the medium term.
17.
▲
by
jrvidal
6y ago
Can you elaborate on what makes you think that? (I'd love it to happen, btw)
18.
▲
by
jrvidal
6y ago
Pardon my ignorance, but is prop drilling a problem once you've bought into Redux or similar?
19.
▲
by
jrvidal
6y ago
> The goal of every top-tier collider is new physics I would argue that the goal of a top-tier collider is to go to new energy ranges, plain and simple. Absence of new phenomena is gained knowledge, albeit a bit boring, but still.
20.
▲
by
jrvidal
6y ago
Shameless plug: https://jrvidal.github.io/aes-demo/ I like this one better though.
21.
▲
by
jrvidal
7y ago
I'm not sure that's correct. `UnsafeCell` is a Rust lang item that might disable some optimizations, I think? https://doc.rust-lang.org/src/core/cell.rs.html#1483
22.
▲
by
jrvidal
7y ago
> The nice thing is that RefCell is not magic I'd like to point out that `RefCell` does contain a bit of magic, since it is based on `UnsafeCell`, which is _the_ core "primitive" of Rust that enables interior mutability:
23.
▲
by
jrvidal
7y ago
> and working with raw "plain old data" > while some of the systems aspects can be a bit lacking Could you elaborate a bit on those two points? I think it'd be very valuable feedback for the Rust devs. (Also, thanks for
24.
▲
by
jrvidal
8y ago
* How much is "way cheaper"? I've heard that VTC licenses are getting more and more expensive, around ~50K € (if I remember correctly). * What do you mean by "concentrated in very few hands (mainly Uber and Cabify)"
25.
▲
by
jrvidal
8y ago
I think your fears are a bit misguided. WebAssembly runs within the same sandbox as JavaScript code. I don't see how this would constitute a _higher_ security risk than browsers as they stand today.
26.
▲
by
jrvidal
9y ago
> Perhaps we need to see what Google and Facebook actually have on us... What do you have in mind?
27.
▲
by
jrvidal
9y ago
I like to repeat myself on this, but proposing "invisible" matter has historically been a very successful strategy in fundamental physics. Simple laws have a tendency to stay simple.
28.
▲
by
jrvidal
9y ago
What's different about it compared to other scientific theories?
29.
▲
by
jrvidal
9y ago
I see now, makes sense.
30.
▲
by
jrvidal
9y ago
Sorry, but I don't understand your argument. When asked 'how do you explain lensing without dark matter?', your answer is 'with this particular flavor of dark matter'?
More ›