jrochkind1

6 ms·

1.
by jrochkind1 6d ago
Oh okay. "No longer enabled by default" made it sound to me like the suggestion was not to use them at all, glad I misunderstood.
2.
by jrochkind1 6d ago
> PS. For obvious reasons, this post will fail Pangram tests. Actual pangram to me says it's 100% human. Current pangram can flag different passages differently, but these are all flagged human by it, even the LLM written ones.
3.
by jrochkind1 6d ago
On theweb, not surprised that Rails switched from kind of encouraging people to use as many browser-automated tests (under whatever name) as possible , to trying to discourage people from using any. Rails way really likes being absolutist.
4.
by jrochkind1 6d ago
indeed it's not totally clear to me if they do or not, my question too! OK, good to know it's not just something I was confused about because of lack of context!
5.
by jrochkind1 6d ago
I'm not totally following the part about the simulator(s), probably because I haven't actually done mobile development before. > When simulator interaction is needed, the CLI can connect to them via a remote mode and drive the
6.
by jrochkind1 7d ago
> and worth investing in, hence Shopify acquiring them) I have nothing against Tailwind, but I think a company with $5 billion in cash reserves and the general context of Shopify may buy a company like Tailwind for community goodwill, to
7.
by jrochkind1 12d ago
> forced to remove their model from access for any none-US citizen for a simple, Because the American government is not rational or reasonable, that's it.
8.
by jrochkind1 18d ago
Is the top not an article about a high-income country expressing serious interest in joining the EU?
9.
by jrochkind1 20d ago
So maybe it works! They are of course models distilling the best click-baity eyeball trapping engagement processes.
10.
by jrochkind1 20d ago
> Nvidia has been (somewhat paradoxically) a dominant force in actual "open source" AI Nothing paradoxical about it, open source AI use raises demand for nvidia's chips too.
11.
by jrochkind1 21d ago
But you actually had an LLM write this article, no?
12.
by jrochkind1 21d ago
VERY interesting, thank you! So it's not just me.
13.
by jrochkind1 21d ago
Maybe people are just learning to write in that style LLMs learned to write from statistical people? "is where the capabilities become unbounded" is a weird thing to say and not really true. "is the end game", "add
14.
by jrochkind1 21d ago
More LLM-generated text about LLMs. Is anyone else actually finding it harder and harder to read LLM generated text? I find it quite tiring, my brain just does not want to get through it.
15.
by jrochkind1 22d ago
So you would probably not in fact assume SWEs would have sympathey for other SWEs then, I'd guess!
16.
by jrochkind1 24d ago
> Users often ask for a particular solution instead of explaining their root issue. Rather than taking the request at face value, I keep digging until I understand what they are trying to accomplish and why existing products do not work
17.
by jrochkind1 1mo ago
You're right, management should have "decided" to triple their budget in order to have double staff, have management with IT experience, have triple the IT staff and pay them double, and pay more for IT vendors/equipment
18.
by jrochkind1 1mo ago
It is definitely not having sufficient budget, although I doubt management was "trying" to be cheap. They probably have 1-2 IT staff, who have been paid significantly under market value compared to private sector. Management was n
19.
by jrochkind1 1mo ago
> You'd assume SWEs would have sympathy for other SWEs. Only if you haven't been reading HN very long!
20.
by jrochkind1 1mo ago
it sounds like Iron Mountain specifically markets itself as "we will never turn over your data without a court order", so whether contractually obligated to do that or not, choosing to do that when they have a legal choice to do s
21.
by jrochkind1 1mo ago
Why was MCP ever stateful in the first place?
22.
by jrochkind1 1mo ago
Still better than AI generated text.
23.
by jrochkind1 1mo ago
"Dedup started as one comparator and grew a channel every time real footage embarrassed it." Is it possible to ever read a piece by LLMs that isn't written by LLMs?
24.
by jrochkind1 1mo ago
I only know about this what I learned from OP and you guys. It sounds like you guys think OP was mistaken, whatever analysis NIST was doing that they reduced in 2024 would not have prevented this anyway? Legit question, I'm trying to u
25.
by jrochkind1 1mo ago
OP suggests something at NIST changed in 2024, where they stopped doing as much verification as they did before. To be sure, the suggestion is not funding cuts, but an increase in workload with same funding. Here is the 2024 NIST announceme
26.
by jrochkind1 1mo ago
The federal government ought to be funding NIST sufficiently to actually do sufficient analysis. Do we care about funding civil "cyber" defense or not? (Obviously the answer is not, we only care about funding offensive capabiltiie
27.
by jrochkind1 2mo ago
Ah, thanks. I am not following at all how an application can do this.
28.
by jrochkind1 2mo ago
If I understnad right, they are saying it scales (to theri needs) with a custom patch to pg changing their semantics, right? It does seem interesting, and possibly welcome if there were a configuration option or even a way to set individu
29.
by jrochkind1 2mo ago
and yet, it remains, in many subreddits.
30.
by jrochkind1 2mo ago
It's also like the only place left on the internet to reliably find real people reviewing things with real opinions.

More ›