jr3592

6 ms·

1.
by jr3592 20d ago
Even better point. Thank you!
2.
by jr3592 21d ago
good point
3.
by jr3592 21d ago
Absolutely terrible. As human beings, we should be prioritizing solving these kinds of problems. I don't think we need to live forever, but a graceful ending later in life remains an objective we haven't fully realized for every
4.
by jr3592 21d ago
Yup, I understand. And through a very narrow definition of economics it makes sense. I just don't see the utility in viewing it this way. You've returned one of the most valuable resources (time) back to a human. In my mind ther
5.
by jr3592 21d ago
Everything is ultimately a chosen definition, nothing is "real". I'd argue the definition is antiquated. In the modern world, free time being returned to individuals is perhaps one of the greatest examples of wealth.
6.
by jr3592 21d ago
I suppose I can understand that perspective, but disagree with it? We should measure time returned to individuals as wealth, maybe even the highest form of wealth.
7.
by jr3592 22d ago
> One of the problems here is that things like this only count as "increased productivity" in the economic sense if it results in more income at the end of the funnel. Are you actually making more product faster in all your new
8.
by jr3592 27d ago
Bummer. I really like my apple vision pro. It's definitely too heavy but for a V1 product it has a lot of promise. Fast forward 10 years and if the components can get small and light enough, it's a no brainer.
9.
by jr3592 1mo ago
The irony here is that his very own post reads (to me) as AI slop. Take this line: > I’ve been thinking about it ever since. Why? Because there is growing grumbling among everyone about AI writing. And it’s not just others; it’s me! Cla
10.
by jr3592 1mo ago
Totally fair and understand that perspective. To some extent, I wish I had the courage to walk away because I agree, much of the joy is gone. I'm not sure what I'd do, or where I'd go though, since software really was/
11.
by jr3592 1mo ago
As if time isn't money? Everything is temporary... Getting somewhere first has immense value.
12.
by jr3592 1mo ago
I hope the author knows they're not alone. This sentiment and existential dread is something many developers are going through right now. Personally, I've decided to lean into AI heavily. My mindset is that life rarely remains s
13.
by jr3592 1mo ago
Had an uncle who swore by this. He died at 57 of ALS. That obviously doesn't mean walking is bad, I just mean to point out that even those people who believe in it as a silver bullet, can be hit with something totally out of left fiel
14.
by jr3592 1mo ago
Agreed on every single point. Fable 5 was the first time I didn't feel these points quite as strongly (pre-neuter). But yea, every frontier model right now behaves this way and its tiring.
15.
by jr3592 1mo ago
pretty interesting, the macro economics of the software space seem shaky
16.
by jr3592 1mo ago
Have you tried Claude? 5.6 feels less verbose, and less messy to me.
17.
by jr3592 2mo ago
Nice! Very cool game. I'm curious about your "limited coding experience", in the context of shipping something like this. In the past, such an app would be impossible (I think) for someone with "limited coding experien
18.
by jr3592 2mo ago
review the outcome, not the code... if the world continues to be dominated by AI coding agents, the code will increasingly become irrelevant.
19.
by jr3592 2mo ago
I find it impossible not to reflect on my personal experience whenever this comes up. I spend 8+ hours a day on a computer, looking at screens. Probably more. I am looking at a screen literally 10 minutes before falling asleep (watching
20.
by jr3592 2mo ago
And risk missing out on the gains in the market that can and likely will happen between then and now. Most researchers have shown that attempting to play the market is likely to fail in the end. Set it and forget it. Ride the wave.
21.
by jr3592 2mo ago
This is such a good point. It matters HOW you use the LLM. Come to it with knowledge and understanding of a subject matter, asking for an implementation? That's different from going to it with no knowledge, asking for guidance on eve
22.
by jr3592 2mo ago
does it work in codex?
23.
by jr3592 2mo ago
if you ask me, there should be an absolute emergency meeting at apple around software quality... its been on a downward slide for almost a decade and its starting to have real impacts.
24.
by jr3592 2mo ago
Curious why you feel that way... Personally I find the feature convenient because I can prompt Codex, running on my mac, with access to everything I've given it access to, directly from my phone. That means all the plugins, the local
25.
by jr3592 2mo ago
Absolutely love it. The West could take some notes. And to those who would jump to downvote, ask yourself why one country is on the rise, and the other is in a drain spiral.
26.
by jr3592 2mo ago
I think this really depends on how you view the problem. What is meant by "Maintainability". Human maintainability? Sure. But throw Claude at the problem, and it will solve it.
27.
by jr3592 2mo ago
Codex does too. It's the best of them. Lets you connect directly to your mac, and run codex ON your mac.
28.
by jr3592 3mo ago
exactly. leave it to a forum mostly populated with software developers to have the most hyperbolic takes.
29.
by jr3592 3mo ago
It would be cool if one could safely adapt to modern life (lots of sitting, required focus over long sessions) without having to spend time exercising if they don't want to (to be clear, some people want to). Imagine if you could just
30.
by jr3592 3mo ago
Most people don't understand how important, even vital, proper rest is. Injuries are almost always the result of overuse and/or insufficient rest. HIIT itself is not dangerous, or even bad for you, if you spend the time to learn

More ›