jqpabc123

8 ms·

1.
by jqpabc123 3d ago
The idea that somehow Nvidia is financing the entire AI industry is laughable. Yes, it is --- and this is not something I said. This is an absurd extrapolation done by you. But there is no denying that Nvidia is investing billions in it&#
2.
by jqpabc123 3d ago
Who are you thinking of? All the "frontier" AI vendors are borrowing money to invest in AI (and buy from Nvidia). None of these Nvidia customers are actually making money from it. Anthropic and OpenAI are two cash burning machin
3.
by jqpabc123 3d ago
But the scale of the entire AI enterprise is massive. Yes --- and the scale of the money being set on fire is epic. And if/when the burning comes to a screeching halt, the resulting crash wil be likewise.
4.
by jqpabc123 3d ago
I've also seen zero evidence that Nvidia is extending this credit to related parties to put in sham orders Have you bothered to look at the finances of Nvidia's AI clients? None of them are making any money. They're borrowi
5.
by jqpabc123 3d ago
"Every $1 invested brings back $100" --- Bernie Madoff
6.
by jqpabc123 4d ago
It's capitalism run amuck --- and on an epic scale. China is the one that is really in the driver's seat here. They have the opportunity and the ability to nullify/wipe out our huge investment in AI.
7.
by jqpabc123 4d ago
Granted OpenAI going insolvent All the "frontier" AI companies *are* currently insolvent. They have never been anything other than cash burning machines. The only way they keep the lights on and the doors open is by borrowing m
8.
by jqpabc123 4d ago
Yes but longer patterns are kind of an outlier. Most of the everyday searching and parsing that I end up doing involves relatively short patterns. Maybe I am an outlier :-)
9.
by jqpabc123 4d ago
Bottom line: The US economy is not really built for competitiveness. Instead, it is built to create and perpetuate functional monopolies. Tariffs are the end result. It is a regressive step toward protection and isolation --- not expansion.
10.
by jqpabc123 5d ago
Ok, so why not use a fast memcmp on the first 4-8 chars of the pattern to identify any potential match and once found, work from there to verify if a full match exists? This is essentially what I have have been doing for years and it is ver
11.
by jqpabc123 5d ago
What would Jesus do? There is nothing the religious mind can't justify.
12.
by jqpabc123 5d ago
Interesting algorithm. I can see how this could be advantageous for moderate length patterns up to 64 bytes. But for short registered sized patterns (4 or 8 bytes), I am somewhat skeptical of any significant advantage over a very tight, bru
13.
by jqpabc123 5d ago
I was always under the impression that it was a less-refined fuel therefore cheaper. I was always under the impression that a big part of the difference in cost is largely due to taxes.
14.
by jqpabc123 7d ago
As far as I know, there is no American AI company that is actually profitable. So how do you define "beating"? Is it the one who sets more or less money on fire?
15.
by jqpabc123 7d ago
Michael Lines sued OpenAI in July, alleging that ChatGPT fueled religious delusions. This is hilarious! Only organized religion is allowed to fuel these sort of delusions.
16.
by jqpabc123 7d ago
US-Based Artificial Intelligence Companies Conducting Industrial-Scale Distillation Campaigns Against Content Creators And Copyright Holders World Wide. What is good for the goose is not good for the gander? Even when endorsed by the US adm
17.
by jqpabc123 8d ago
So China can't steal the data that US companies stole fair and square? https://www.techopedia.com/trump-administration-openai-train...
18.
by jqpabc123 8d ago
So they can film you but you can't film them? Double standard much?
19.
by jqpabc123 9d ago
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/parenting/mom...
20.
by jqpabc123 12d ago
They have been for the past year That's the storyline they want the public/investors to believe. What they have been telling the authorities is very different. Tesla filed new comments with the California Public Utilities Commi
21.
by jqpabc123 12d ago
This is really a make or break moment for Tesla. Regardless of any "investigation", the big change here is that Tesla is now solely responsible (and liable) for the safety of a "autonomous" driving system that still requ
22.
by jqpabc123 12d ago
Afair, they started running out of some Fairphone 3 spare parts around 2024 So "longevity" is actually about 5 years. Or less if you live in the USA. https://us.fairphone.com/repairs
23.
by jqpabc123 12d ago
So "longevity" is actually about 5 years. Or less if you live in the USA.
24.
by jqpabc123 12d ago
With a Starlink connection fully integrated. Why does a fully autonomous vehicle need satellite internet? Maybe this is the answer: https://www.motor1.com/news/744421/tesla-cybercab-driven-rem...
25.
by jqpabc123 12d ago
The new $650 Fairphone Gen 6+ is designed both for longevity and easy repairability. I applaud the concept but to see how well this actually holds up in the real world, let's check the Fairphone web site. Where are the parts to repai
26.
by jqpabc123 13d ago
He didn't charge "whatever the market would bear" for prescription drugs. His prices are fairly comparable for his limited selection of cheap generics compared to other mail order options. Also, his pricing is cash only ---
27.
by jqpabc123 13d ago
he said that if he bought a hospital, he would operate it like a startup, strip out unnecessary overhead And then he would charge whatever the market would bear in order to maximize return on his investment. "Running it like a busine
28.
by jqpabc123 14d ago
Tesla filed new comments with the California Public Utilities Commission that amount to a quiet admission: its “Robotaxi” service still relies on both in-car human drivers and domestic remote operators to function. https://elec
29.
by jqpabc123 14d ago
In other words, this government is above the law.
30.
by jqpabc123 14d ago
https://jrpn.jovial.com/ You're welcone.

More ›