jpkw

9 ms·

1.
by jpkw 3mo ago
Red Herring* - it's a fish, not a rabbit
2.
by jpkw 3mo ago
there are plenty of sources reporting this: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-08/spacex-ip... https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/spacex-ipo-running-...
3.
by jpkw 3mo ago
Which in turn was a huge upgrade from classical methods
4.
by jpkw 4mo ago
If the space economy expands + if spacex continue to hold market share + if it can do so while increasing profitably against increasing competition in the future. And considering the argument is for "the most valuable company", if
5.
by jpkw 4mo ago
At least for art - I don't think you'll find anyone who actually enjoys art hanging up anything produced by AI on their walls. For these kinds of "customers", they could equally easily frame & hang up a poster of the
6.
by jpkw 4mo ago
Depreciation should be quite substantial - I recall reading that the starlink sats have a 5 year life expectancy?
7.
by jpkw 6mo ago
I think a more fair and accurate comparison would be religion.
8.
by jpkw 8mo ago
Come on now, by this logic marines should not be allowed to live in the US at all as they couldn't be trusted to go out in public without strangling someone for doing something that they deem a potential threat.
9.
by jpkw 8mo ago
Deploying troops to Greenland right now would be solely aimed at seizing Greenland by force and would be a major international incident against the US's most important military allies. Deploying troops to Minnesota would be a domestic
10.
by jpkw 9mo ago
I think the above comment was a joke (Claude frequently says that whenever you challenge it, whether you are right or wrong)
11.
by jpkw 9mo ago
Right, I'm just going to teach my dog to do my job then and get free money as my brain is no more magic, special or different to theirs!
12.
by jpkw 9mo ago
Maybe something like a publicly traded company, Citizens can vote directly on individual bills, or choose a proxy to vote on their behalf (and change that choice at any point that desire).
13.
by jpkw 9mo ago
No. You state that this is all that it would take to be considered as tremendous business value. You are moving your goal posts on your point. My point is that you are taking an absolute position that there is tremendous business value in i
14.
by jpkw 9mo ago
So if the plateau is unanimously declared to have been reached tomorrow OR just one more tiny use case exists tomorrow and all others dwindle away to nothing, than you consider yourself to be correct? What a wild assertion!
15.
by jpkw 10mo ago
Hoping someone here may know the answer to this, but do any of the benchmarks that exist currently account for false answers in any meaningful way, other than it would in a typical test (ie, if I give any answer at all it is better than say
16.
by jpkw 10mo ago
Dick, take a look out of starboard. Oh my god, it looks like a huge...
17.
by jpkw 1y ago
I would love it if this were the solution, embossed card imprinters can work without internet and power and are both fast and intuitive. It worked as a primary method in the past, it can work as a backup method in the future.
18.
by jpkw 1y ago
Just adding to op, for some (myself included) it is quite painful to see loose in place of lose, this should be fixed asap as it distracts the reader from the content. Lose = opposite of win, loose = opposite of tight.
19.
by jpkw 1y ago
Agreed with this comment and the one above it - I think the difficulty is spot on but the UI was a bit frustrating on chrome/android and I may have given up sooner but for my love of solving puzzles.
20.
by jpkw 2y ago
I will jump on the obvious error too but will provide some more context: You are typing what you hear in: "shouldn't've" which is a double contraction of "should not have" "I should not of made this"
21.
by jpkw 2y ago
In each of those examples, we said "no" decades after they were developed, and many had to suffer in order for us to get to the stage of saying "no".
22.
by jpkw 2y ago
Testing with "Banana... Banana???? Banana!!!!!" Yields interesting results each time, and none so far the way a human would read it.
23.
by jpkw 2y ago
Good work, I like the look and feel of it all. It would be good for the dismiss of the "goal within reach" message to be permanent so each time I make a slight adjustment it doesn't keep popping up. It would also be good to h
24.
by jpkw 2y ago
Not sure how you'd execute this, but I think a great method of control for rhythm would be like a karaoke bouncing ball that you control with a keystroke. eg: -I write out my lyrics -you break my lyrics down to [x] syllables -I