jojo100

6 ms·

1.
by jojo100 2y ago
Yeah, it clearly does. Lot of sweating collars.
2.
by jojo100 2y ago
Just a quick reminder to any potential felons in finance/crypto/corporate settings. If you decide to rob billions from the public, we'll let you out in about a decade as long as you don't beat someone up in prison. Just
3.
by jojo100 2y ago
What a travesty of American justice. He'll be out in 12-13 years and will jet off to the mansion he bought for his parents in the Bahamas with his customer's money. You just know the smug felon has a huge BC wallet Caroline is hid
4.
by jojo100 2y ago
Don't spare too much of a thought for SBF. He won't go to the same prison you will.
5.
by jojo100 2y ago
This might be the most out of touch comment I've ever read, to the point where it genuinely looks like sarcasm mocking someone who would think like that. Apologies if so.
6.
by jojo100 3y ago
Good.
7.
by jojo100 3y ago
>I really don't like this--opt-out never works because the scale advantages are backwards. It places the burden in the wrong place. The aggregators should have to get opt-in. >Look at YouTube. Because of "opt-out", lots
8.
by jojo100 3y ago
Content creators and publishers are also the primary ones who are using generative AI. They aren't a united monolith against generative AI.
9.
by jojo100 3y ago
This is what people on the "this is copyright infringement" side don't understand. Even if it somehow is copyright infringement by the standards of today's law, those laws will inevitably change in the near future. Gener
10.
by jojo100 3y ago
>Where generative AI ingests copyrighted works in order to work and bases its output on it, then it is copyright infringement This is an absurd standard. Is it copyright infringement when a human "ingests" copyrighted work and