johnwoods

6 ms·

1.
by johnwoods 3y ago
Wow, this looks incredible! It looks like the release post has changed significantly since I saw and shared it. Looking forward to the benchmarks and 1.0!
2.
Skytable's new NoSQL engine released with injection protection(skytable.io)
1 points by johnwoods 3y ago|0 comments
3.
ArangGraphML Leverages Intel's PyG Optimizations(arangodb.com)
3 points by johnwoods 3y ago|0 comments
4.
by johnwoods 3y ago
Congratulations to the Godot team! I have used Godot a lot in the past and can't wait to replace my Unity junk.
5.
by johnwoods 3y ago
Alright looks like a proper release post was made. Ignore this one.
6.
Skytable NoSQL Database: Even with BlueQL, Skytable Outperforms Redis and KeyDB(github.com)
1 points by johnwoods 3y ago|2 comments
7.
by johnwoods 3y ago
Benchmarks here: https://github.com/ohsayan/sky-benches
8.
by johnwoods 4y ago
Apart from your buzzword marketing, what features are actually available for use today? Most are "on the roadmap." Reminds me of Spacedrive which literally launched with a "nice UI" and no actual features that they adv
9.
by johnwoods 4y ago
That's a hell lot of buzzwords (GPT-3 trained with HN titles, eh?). Does "serverless" and "cloud-native" database together even make any sense? Idk, but I feel like these folks are doing too much pointless marketing
10.
Skytable – A realtime NoSQL Database written in Rust (in dev)(github.com)
2 points by johnwoods 4y ago|0 comments
11.
by johnwoods 4y ago
if I'm doing my math right: redis is doing 99892 sets per sec, so 25X should be 2,497,300. the video however shows 1,023,030 which is more like 10X and NOT 25X
12.
by johnwoods 4y ago
please note that I ran the bench with 30 threads with 1 connection per thread. you're not doing the same but doing 28 threads with 20 connections on each thread, effectively using 560 connections whereas I only used 30 connections. rer
13.
by johnwoods 4y ago
agree with your article entirely. the dragonfly benchmark seems far too artificial to be true and used in practice (given the expensive hardware). my tests were on a relatively cheaper box, and Skytable topped all the other systems.
14.
by johnwoods 4y ago
not if I can get equivalent (if not better) performance on my existing hardware
15.
by johnwoods 4y ago
> My old friend Memcached just came by and want to say Hello. He is still alive and kicking. Netflix has been treating him well. Forgot my dear buddy. Added it back.
16.
by johnwoods 4y ago
updated the post with the overall result for now
17.
by johnwoods 4y ago
updated the post. I ran the benches that were mentioned here[1] and here[2]. [1]: https://github.com/dragonflydb/dragonfly#benchmarks [2]: https://github.com/ohsayan/sky-benches
18.
by johnwoods 4y ago
updated the post
19.
by johnwoods 4y ago
reminds me about the need for AI/ML in random things. maybe it's to sell the "powered by AI/ML" tag. just another hypestorm
20.
Redis vs. KeyDB vs. Dragonfly vs. Skytable
130 points by johnwoods 4y ago|54 comments
21.
by johnwoods 4y ago
It's funny that so many startups are led to thinking that they "need" K8s
22.
by johnwoods 4y ago
As noted by another HN user, it's clear that this doesn't do anything interesting on Linux. Also, higher codegen units will produce slower code at times. Overall, on Linux I do not notice any significant improvement in build times
23.
by johnwoods 5y ago
Looks like it was released just a few hours back. After reading the post[1] it seems that this is intentional. Anyways, I guess we could open a feature request. [1]: https://ohsayan.github.io/2022/02/jotsy-a-self-h