johnpaulkiser

6 ms·

1.
by johnpaulkiser 2mo ago
Yeah the auth angle and unobtrusive integration path seems like the real neat thing here. From your customers eyes its just another user account right? Is that a requirement to integrate it? your app has to essentially have "teams&quot
2.
by johnpaulkiser 3mo ago
Not to mention the market is tiny, a few thousand seats at most.
3.
by johnpaulkiser 4mo ago
willingness to stand in line for a ticket probably correlates well with fandom
4.
by johnpaulkiser 4mo ago
I think its more complicated than that. An artist is pretty constrained by how many shows they can play in a given area which makes the total market for any given show really small and trivially manipulated for profit.
5.
by johnpaulkiser 4mo ago
I think tweaking section 230 in the US would have a similar effect. Make corporations liable for posts that they algorithmically amplify. The "discovery" algorithms would become banal overnight without an outright ban.
6.
by johnpaulkiser 7mo ago
Oh, I thought the purpose was to to build a "copy this saas" app? You give the agent a URL it records itself going through UX flows, give that video to a coding agent and you have quite a feature.
7.
by johnpaulkiser 8mo ago
interestingly opencode's first product was an IaC platform... seems to be where this is all going.
8.
by johnpaulkiser 8mo ago
Why not just share a video of the "bloomberg terminal" clone he prompted in 2 hours?
9.
by johnpaulkiser 8mo ago
How big were the lots? How far of a walk was the closest bar, grocery store, cafe? Do you have to walk onto someone's property to talk to them if they are sitting on the porch? I lived in a car dependent burb for 20+ years and would ra
10.
by johnpaulkiser 8mo ago
This sounds like a stop loss? Are they losing money per token even through the api?
11.
by johnpaulkiser 8mo ago
There will be no royalties, simply make all the models that trained on the public internet also be required to be public. This won't help tailwind in this case, but it'll change the answer to "Should I publish this thing free
12.
by johnpaulkiser 8mo ago
> if you train your model on this, your weights and training code must be published. This feels like the simplest & best single regulation that can be applied in this industry.
13.
by johnpaulkiser 8mo ago
Tailwind should have bought shadcn and started pushing a better subscription model. Shadcn & vercel ate tailwind's lunch imo.
14.
by johnpaulkiser 10mo ago
Even if he did make the money he claims, he is selling the idea that "you too can make money by exposing all your users private info."
15.
"Vibe coder" on X claims SaaS makes $60k while app is trivially insecure(twitter.com)
16 points by johnpaulkiser 10mo ago|5 comments
16.
by johnpaulkiser 10mo ago
I'm getting sick and tired of people on Twitter/X making wild claims that they can build a profitable app with 100% vibe coding so I started poking around and can almost always find a business destroying vulnerability. In this cas
17.
by johnpaulkiser 1y ago
Soon with little help at all for static sites like this. Had chatgpt "recreate" the background image from a screenshot of the site using it's image generator, then had "agent mode" create a linktree style "vers
18.
by johnpaulkiser 1y ago
I'm building a sort of "neocities" like thing for LLMs and humans alike. It uses git-like content addressability so forking and remix a website is trivial. Although i haven't built those frontend features yet. You can cu
19.
by johnpaulkiser 1y ago
You get all the money from the block rewards for those blocks if you reorg other miners blocks out.
20.
by johnpaulkiser 1y ago
I doubts thats what they want. They want a static fixed price, $5k a month for example and never have to think about it.
21.
by johnpaulkiser 1y ago
Are you saying "see the world?" or "seaworld"?
22.
by johnpaulkiser 1y ago
Let me help you. An AI boss would be 100x worse.
23.
by johnpaulkiser 1y ago
Man, I must really suck at this stuff. This is not at all my experience. Asking LLMs to refactor almost always results in hasty abstractions that I want to keep out of my codebases at all cost. Am I not letting go enough?
24.
by johnpaulkiser 1y ago
I think we need to be very careful & intentional about the language we use with these kinds of tools, especially now that the MCP floodgates have been opened. You aren't just exposing the users browsing data to which ever model the
25.
by johnpaulkiser 1y ago
> Private > Since automation happens locally, your browser activity stays on your device and isn't sent to remote servers. I think this is bullshit. Isn't the dom or whatever sent to the model api?
26.
by johnpaulkiser 1y ago
A platform for indie devs to publish WIP web games: ( https://flipkick.gg ) The goal is to build a discovery system/algo that surfaces stickiness and fun to give developers a tighter publish/iterate feedback loop so they
27.
by johnpaulkiser 6y ago
With the news around PH not accepting credit cards anymore I'm curious to see how much revenue they generate through bitcoin in the next quarter. I imagine their revenue will drop substantially.
28.
by johnpaulkiser 6y ago
What do you mean by layer of trust? Bitcoin is definitely not "trustless" its trust minimized for sure. Lightning also minimizes trust in a very similar way. As a user you don't have to make any more assumptions when using li
29.
by johnpaulkiser 6y ago
No, node software verifies transactions. Miners are supposed to also verify transactions because they should also run a validating node. There have been blocks in the past mined by miners who did not verify the transactions before putting t
30.
by johnpaulkiser 6y ago
That question doesn't make a whole lot of sense so I'll answer another one. Do off-chain transactions need to be mined using proof of work? No.

More ›