johnnienaked

6 ms·

1.
by johnnienaked 3d ago
So we're arresting the people at Anthropic that made it possible, right? Right?
2.
by johnnienaked 3d ago
How can you not believe it? Neither of them are even close to making a profit and the market is saturated with cheaper alternatives. This is a ploy for regulatory capture.
3.
by johnnienaked 8d ago
It's a ridiculous explanation that makes no sense.
4.
by johnnienaked 8d ago
I especially loved the part where he claims they spent $60m on compute to push on N-S because of a Twitter rumor, and they totally didn't steal the idea from mathematicians using their tools.
5.
by johnnienaked 8d ago
Sounds like a great time for open mathematical research is upon us. /s
6.
by johnnienaked 8d ago
Token Bill Hunting
7.
by johnnienaked 8d ago
It's too late. Sub models are deployed at every major organization in the United States and all it will take is turning off the option to improve the model for them to train directly on your own personal workflow, which CEOs will greed
8.
by johnnienaked 8d ago
They don't need to train a whole model. They can feed it new information and fine tune it.
9.
by johnnienaked 9d ago
How is it unclear? The entire point of deploying models across corporate America is to train on your workflows. Eventually replacing you with digital you is why they're doing it!
10.
by johnnienaked 9d ago
It wouldn't be shocking at all. They stole human data to train the first models and they've been stealing it ever since to train new models. Stealing mathematicians private chats and private research and taking credit for it would
11.
by johnnienaked 9d ago
They stole it.
12.
by johnnienaked 9d ago
LLMs do nothing but steal, and the companies that own them are fully aware and eager to do it.
13.
by johnnienaked 9d ago
LLMs are nothing but giant theft machines.
14.
by johnnienaked 1mo ago
Because, like 98% of people in this space, you don't mention or even consider cost. Improving the lower bound of Riemann is impressive, but how impressive would it remain if it was announced that training and inference cost $1 billion
15.
by johnnienaked 1mo ago
I wouldn't be surprised if half these proofs turn out to be well crafted hallucinations, barring of course the ones actually verified in Lean
16.
by johnnienaked 1mo ago
Yet a significant percentage of people simultaneously believe it "reasoned" its way to novel mathematical proofs. Something doesn't jive
17.
by johnnienaked 1mo ago
I wonder how much it cost(s)
18.
by johnnienaked 1mo ago
Net good for Meta, they hope
19.
by johnnienaked 1mo ago
It's literally just brute forcing lol
20.
by johnnienaked 4mo ago
Our very strong and very domestic stupidiy, naivete, and ignorance is way more important of a factor than foreign influence.
21.
by johnnienaked 4mo ago
LLMs are going to do none of this, so there's really no worry
22.
by johnnienaked 4mo ago
LLMs will be great politicians one day
23.
by johnnienaked 4mo ago
The cope about this "not being new" is pretty typical denial I'm glad to have left up there.
24.
by johnnienaked 5mo ago
Metaverse?
25.
by johnnienaked 5mo ago
There hasn't been one dollar of profit from any company, it's more a battle of how low you can keep your losses
26.
by johnnienaked 5mo ago
This seems to be a slow discovering of the inherent limitations.
27.
by johnnienaked 5mo ago
Good article and it's on the mark
28.
by johnnienaked 5mo ago
I thought bitcoin was cool for about 6 months back in 2014, and read everything I could about it. For the life of me I simply can't understand how people are still so interested in it or who created it.
29.
by johnnienaked 5mo ago
Couldn't agree more. If you don't want to be famous in today's day and age, don't do infamous shit.
30.
by johnnienaked 5mo ago
Amazing to see a lot of the comments stating the exact qualifiers he laid out as potential counterarguments to his writeup. Did they even read it?

More ›