johnjj257

5 ms·

1.
by johnjj257 5y ago
No that's just govt. Censorship vs regular censorship. Moderation is the exact same thing they can both do it. Just because it isn't the government doesn't mean they aren't censoring. Censorship is NOT just government ac
2.
by johnjj257 5y ago
You should get out more lol
3.
by johnjj257 5y ago
Yea and if it can't it's essentially dead...
4.
by johnjj257 5y ago
What architecture are YOU building aren't you a lawyer? Consider using the royal we especially around the real architects
5.
by johnjj257 5y ago
It is very odd to call it gaslighting when it's a giant movement, attributing something like that to a young group of people with a wide ranging message looks very odd and because you don't look below the surface at all you have n
6.
by johnjj257 5y ago
Ok sure complain about the phrase if you want I get that, whatever it just feels like an odd complaint given the situation. It's kind of hard to organize a giant movement and this is what you get. Yes it's a muddled mix but two th
7.
by johnjj257 5y ago
You keep jumping to singular examples when I just explained yes, you can find extreme outliers, but you are ignoring the large majority of people and their intent. And you keep pointing to op eds and sensationalized news stories OF COURSE t
8.
by johnjj257 5y ago
That is a very straw manned interpretation of the phrase. I don't particularly love the phrase myself but this is a dishonest interpretation. Of course a few people probably believe that but it's a giant movement and the large maj
9.
by johnjj257 5y ago
... of course this is so redundant but urinals are an obvious solution for half the population and already in place... Like I said there would be a massive cost this is nowhere near trivial like someone stated. I also mentioned there may be
10.
by johnjj257 5y ago
Haha, ok you can believe any "expert" you want if it makes you feel better. I have no idea who that is and I dont care. Try looking at the idea logically and within a body of science not out of context and cherry picked =) You sho
11.
by johnjj257 5y ago
It's nothing formal just saying an assumption based on an assumption keeps having lower chances of being correct the further you take it.
12.
by johnjj257 5y ago
You're on 3rd order assumptions at this point
13.
by johnjj257 5y ago
This is full of false information about sex, it is most certainly NOT just a spectrum of traits that is one shallow dimension that you focused on for the benfit of your agenda and the least scientific approach. You won't easily find su
14.
by johnjj257 5y ago
Ok...What are you talking about? Don't they already? How does changing that help anything? It would certainly still be a massive slowdown for half the population and certainly not "trivial" to change them all
15.
by johnjj257 5y ago
Huh? I dunno, but I do believe no guy wants to wait 4x as long to be politically correct or for whatever marginal perceived benefit there may be for some tiny population. Nevermind the cost Your example is way off because they are not equal
16.
by johnjj257 5y ago
Exactly why make everyone wait in one line when half the group goes way faster? I doubt that's coming anytime soon. Would be big dumb and have no real support
17.
by johnjj257 5y ago
This is so not the point lol
18.
by johnjj257 6y ago
Still super creepy and psycho
19.
by johnjj257 6y ago
ROFL NO. The entire sentiment is a kids argument and you sound like a crying kid and a hater. No one's gonna refute the ""arguments"" because it's a fucking long dipshit statement of epic proportions. Who wants
20.
by johnjj257 6y ago
Rofl wow man you can trash anything must be nice to just shit on geniune development and call it crap. The issue is the article actually had a tired argument, your broken attempt to reframe electric cars as useless is really bizarre and not
21.
by johnjj257 6y ago
So... Gdpr doesn't apply to individuals or a person who happens to use a random social media app to find out such freely available info
22.
by johnjj257 6y ago
Those threads don't show anything interesting, some just bash the org for spending any of the money they receive in a way someone doesn't like from years and years ago. This is silly
23.
by johnjj257 6y ago
No. That would be making an incorrect assumption, that the best of the best want to work as a civil servant...
24.
by johnjj257 6y ago
Cool but there's tons of game outlets on pc, not on iphone
25.
by johnjj257 6y ago
Even further, just because you benefited indirectly through a parent, someone who doesn't have children is still receiving less benefit than someone with children. They are getting the benefit twice. Whereas a childless person gets it
26.
by johnjj257 6y ago
>Clearly it doesn't suck to be them, if the only inconvenience they have had is to support their colleagues during times they have needed it How does it not suck that they are getting the short end of the stick? They are the ones co
27.
by johnjj257 6y ago
There's no lack of parents or children so none of these points seems to matter anyway. Overpopulation is actually more of an issue. > Everyone needs parents around, even if they aren't one themselves. No, children need adults a
28.
by johnjj257 6y ago
Again of course, but it still excludes people without kids. You're repeating the same thing in a different way.
29.
by johnjj257 6y ago
How so? The typo? Everyone uses the school so everyone should not complain. Everyone is not a parent so the analogy breaks down.
30.
by johnjj257 6y ago
Of course? So what? Many of those children will not have children of their own, so that puts them in a different class than their parents. Which is why that is different then going to school.

More ›