joelberger

7 ms·

1.
OpenZFS 2.2 is nearly here, and ZFSBootMenu 2.2 already is(theregister.com)
4 points by joelberger 3y ago|0 comments
2.
by joelberger 6y ago
5^6 is 15625 and I think that would have been a better use of a future version number
3.
by joelberger 8y ago
It is built on an ioloop and has a special emphasis on making websockets and other streaming communications easy.
4.
by joelberger 9y ago
This is the point that I can't get anyone to see. So what if they provide history? They can take it away at any point too. So what have you accomplished?!
5.
by joelberger 10y ago
Perl 6 looks very promising. It was an attempt to brush up Perl 5 but became its own language with a very unfortunate name (read: Perl 6 will not replace Perl 5). It has some very interesting features, including the built-in concurrency pri
6.
by joelberger 10y ago
Those presentations were abhorrent and the conference should be embarrassed for giving such a buffoon the stage (twice!). He doesn't know the language and then lampoons it when he gets it wrong. Here are some rebuttals (one of which is
7.
On the Danger of Software Magicians(medium.com)
3 points by joelberger 10y ago|0 comments
8.
by joelberger 10y ago
Giving that one a try too. Thanks for the link.
9.
by joelberger 10y ago
And by the way, no I'm really not interested in generally helping with a language I don't use. What I object to is the Perl6 community siphoning off Perl5 oxygen and then using it to do nothing. I WAS willing to help ... in the mo
10.
by joelberger 10y ago
You'll notice that that irc log is just me saying october what I'm saying now. The release was botched. Had I had any idea of the lackluster release that was to come I would have helped. This is a better log to read IMO: http:&#x
11.
by joelberger 10y ago
I think the biggest problem Perl6 faces now is the perception that it is unfinished. This is mostly a problem of their own making. The language was in development for 15 years! In that time people got it drilled into their head that it wasn