jmtulloss

6 ms·

1.
by jmtulloss 14d ago
I think the parent was referring to hosting the entire NPM registry, not having a project that uses NPM. In that case there's substantial duplication from version to version.
2.
by jmtulloss 20d ago
[disclaimer: I used to work at stripe] I agree with you in principle but I don't think that market cap is the right metric. Market cap captures a lot of assumptions around product mix and growth rates that have been in Stripe's fa
3.
by jmtulloss 20d ago
I forked my Big Serious Harness™ that models construction projects into a harness for building a vibe coded family assistant. I couldn't figure out how to make the toy operate at toy prices until Luna. Now you can vibe code all the lit
4.
by jmtulloss 26d ago
I’ve been playing with this with software that needs to work with agents and also without internet at all (we’re serving construction projects that have limited access) Obviously agent access goes away with internet failure but the state do
5.
by jmtulloss 28d ago
This is pretty interesting but I wish it would have been refined in two ways: - The prose before the data appears to be AI generated. Not a big deal but it makes the reader work harder to figure out what's actually being said. - Linear
6.
by jmtulloss 1mo ago
Everyone is hating but this is a hack and you love to see it.
7.
by jmtulloss 1mo ago
I pushed my Home Assistant app here, you can look at it or ask your Hearth agent to copy it into your Hearth https://github.com/bearbuild/hearth-apps/tree/main/home-assi... I just have the UI working wit
8.
by jmtulloss 1mo ago
We don't have a ton of IoT providers built in right now but you _can_ hook up anything with an API by configuring a proxy with an API token. That will let the agent access the device without having access to the token. Then you can ask
9.
Show HN: Hearth – a shared family workspace where an agent can build apps
9 points by jmtulloss 1mo ago|3 comments
10.
by jmtulloss 2mo ago
I am working on this at bear.build. It's early, but I would love to get your feedback if you have some time. justin@bear.build
11.
by jmtulloss 2mo ago
If you're only accepting crypto, you're effectively not serving the US market and the policy would be considered successful.
12.
by jmtulloss 2mo ago
it appears that 3% is the threshold as 3.1% gets the nod the other way
13.
by jmtulloss 2mo ago
It's because they had an AI say it instead of a human who's thinking deeply about what they're trying to say. TBC I love AI and am totally bought in, but human taste and _severe_ editing is still required, just as it would be
14.
by jmtulloss 4mo ago
Is your argument that $1500 / mo is too much? Why would the engineering team not be more rigorous in their model selection given a constraint?
15.
by jmtulloss 4mo ago
Why do you think this? Confidential filings before an IPO are standard practice.
16.
by jmtulloss 6mo ago
Exactly this. If there is some nuance in the article vs what Claude can tell you, then that's worthwhile. This article is just generated with a specific prompt on style but very little content editing. What's the point? It's
17.
by jmtulloss 6mo ago
The best stretch Github ever had was post-acquisition when Nat Friedman as CEO.
18.
by jmtulloss 6mo ago
FWIW the whole group received permission to cross. The instructions were to "Truck 1 and company", not just Truck 1
19.
by jmtulloss 8mo ago
The comments so far seem focused on taking a cheap shot, but as somebody working on using AI to help people with hard, long-term tasks, it's a valuable piece of writing. - It's short and to the point - It's actionable in the
20.
by jmtulloss 8mo ago
Yes, it’s not a hill I’m willing to die on. It’s a hill I’m willing to defend until the cause is lost.
21.
by jmtulloss 8mo ago
This is what I'm saying. Chipmunks are not squirrels. I will do my best on this hill.
22.
LLM-as-a-Courtroom(falconer.com)
74 points by jmtulloss 8mo ago|30 comments
23.
by jmtulloss 9mo ago
Obviously novel problems require novel solutions, but the vast majority of software solutions are remixes of existing methods. I don’t know your work so I may be wrong in this specific case, but there are a vanishingly small number of peopl
24.
by jmtulloss 9mo ago
The reason for this is Rivian and Tesla bet big on software defined platforms… ie every piece of hardware talks to a small number of central computers instead of many independent systems. This gives them a huge leg up in developing software
25.
by jmtulloss 9mo ago
The current Gen 1s will start beeping at you if they can’t see the lines. If you don’t take over quickly it will start slowing down and beeping very insistently.
26.
by jmtulloss 9mo ago
Not only is Rivian betting on an integrated platform being important for their own cars long term, they’ve also essentially sold that portion of their business to VW. They are investing in the software platform for a lot more cars than just
27.
by jmtulloss 11mo ago
Linear is a venture funded company
28.
by jmtulloss 11mo ago
A lot of commenters are focusing on the legalities and likelihood of backpay, which is relevant but I tend to agree with you… it’ll get paid because it’s in the interest of both parties to pay their employees what they’re owed. We’re starin
29.
by jmtulloss 11mo ago
And the republicans could just vote to change the rules of the senate. The out of power party gets a little veto power here. The republicans know the day will come they want that, so they won’t change the rules even though they have the pow
30.
by jmtulloss 11mo ago
My interpretation of the parent comment was that they were loading specific curl calls into context so that Claude could properly exercise the endpoints after making changes.

More ›