jksk61

5 ms·

1.
Fast-Graphrag(github.com)
2 points by jksk61 2y ago|0 comments
2.
by jksk61 2y ago
Is a TL;DR available or at least some of the ideas covered? Because after 3 paragraphs it seems the good old "it is actually something resembling a cellular automata" post by Wolfram.
3.
by jksk61 2y ago
funny paper, I still don't know what was the goal of it. It is evident to anyone that LLM can't perform any meaningful reasoning, why even bothering in building such an infrastructure to test whether it is able to become a "s
4.
by jksk61 2y ago
not even childish gambino ref saved it.
5.
The Promise of SGLT2 Inhibitors(worksinprogress.co)
10 points by jksk61 2y ago|0 comments
6.
by jksk61 2y ago
in fact it is nothing new.
7.
by jksk61 2y ago
"you were supposed to destroy evangelisms not join them!"
8.
by jksk61 3y ago
now the question is: what is the most complex* object that it is not turing complete? * let's say you have n distinct rules acting against a set S, the complexity is n. p.s. probably something trivial exists such that you can take n as
9.
by jksk61 3y ago
bruh! with 100 mln elements in the dataset it is basically printing out previously known problems during testing.
10.
by jksk61 3y ago
I don't get it, what's cool about it? Einstein notation seems good enough for most of the things and they are equivalent. Is there anything interesting (i.e. new) that this notation allow?
11.
by jksk61 3y ago
> What's the strength of play for the GPT architecture? It's impressive that it figures out the rules, but does it play strong chess? sometimes it is not a matter of "is it better? is it larger? is it more efficient?"
12.
by jksk61 3y ago
it seems to try too hard on proving things have improved by white lying a bit. Some examples: * Environment: air quality in most places has continued to improve (and considering the growing evidence on the harms of air pollution, this may w
13.
by jksk61 3y ago
very nice!
14.
by jksk61 3y ago
If you need an exponential number of coupled oscillators to construct a general purpose computer, then you don't have the exponential speedup.
15.
by jksk61 3y ago
of course not, none is considering fusion as a reliable workable solution for the 2050 net zero goals. I mean they don't even consider opting out gas and oil until 2040s or even later lol
16.
by jksk61 3y ago
I don't know about you but I use chat gpt to solve captcha because I can't.
17.
by jksk61 3y ago
yes it is an interesting read, however you should know that some of their "facts" are highly speculative and some were proven wrong in the last decade.
18.
by jksk61 3y ago
color me surprised.
19.
by jksk61 3y ago
also removing skip connections leads to a rougher loss landscape, hence it should be harder to find the optimal weights.
20.
by jksk61 3y ago
I don't know, it is an opinion and it seems kind of well-founded (i.e. there's no evidence for groundbreaking research on OpenAI part except for scaling things up).
21.
by jksk61 3y ago
I don't understand why investing money in something that it is reliable and not requiring major reworks on the electric grid would be beneficial, incredible! I am more baffled than you. also, in case you didn't know sweden doesn&#
22.
by jksk61 3y ago
what a laughable sentence, there have been at least 2 near misses last year between starlink satellites and Tiangong. Also, if there's a collision, the smaller parts and debris would remain in orbit far longer than expected (hence caus
23.
by jksk61 3y ago
these kind of books are "philosophical" books. In the sense that the usage can be written/explained in other ways. For instance, monads are just a way to see that if you compose two ducks you still have ducks that behave in t
24.
by jksk61 3y ago
well it could be useful in literature where there are way too many zhang...
25.
by jksk61 3y ago
Nice, but what are the minimum requirements to run it locally?
26.
by jksk61 3y ago
No it is obviously Paris, Texas
27.
by jksk61 3y ago
one could argue that the most important criteria is that if you take any interval between 0 and 1 you get the same density... at least that would be a uniform distribution, since even a normal, exponential or whatever could have mean 0.5 an
28.
by jksk61 3y ago
If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will
29.
by jksk61 3y ago
Yeah, but what about "On april 19th, I made bread"? See also https://pastebin.com/tKLSWjSt , which is a collection of Pompei graffiti.
30.
by jksk61 3y ago
you are using a browser which has zero day vulnerabilities nonetheless.

More ›