jjlustig

11 ms·

1.
by jjlustig 3y ago
You also are going to quickly run into scaling issues. A main sell is that you have a team of “experts” draft the standard terms. But this means a new “expert” team for every new contract-type AND industry. The same type of contract (e.g.,
2.
by jjlustig 3y ago
Lawyers are bimodal in this regard. Many hate the work with a burning passion. Many love the work and never want to retire. IMO, it really depends on the practice area + role (e.g., M&A work vs. civil rights work or big law attorney vs.
3.
by jjlustig 3y ago
Translation: “I realize that Google is behind on the AI race (and on our corporate strategy in general), so I’m going to fear monger you, the investment community, with claims of “AGI soon” to attract investments and prevent our stock from
4.
by jjlustig 4y ago
I've been very interested in this space (political group for AI regulation). And actually, I just recently got an initiative I've been thinking of for awhile off the ground. How can I get in touch with you 00F_? You can reach me a
5.
by jjlustig 5y ago
> By contrast, there are a number of things the Supreme Court has simply made up. Conjuring a “right to privacy” from “penumbras” of the other amendments is an example. If you take the majority view from Griswold, I agree. But if you tak
6.
by jjlustig 5y ago
Your also forgetting the 16th amendment (federal income tax). This arguably was the critical aspect in increasing federal power.
7.
by jjlustig 5y ago
HN loves to focus on only one of the normative goals of patents - to incentivize innovation. But there is another almost equally important goal of the patent system - to incentivize disclosure. While I agree that the use of vague language i