jjfoooo6

7 ms·

1.
by jjfoooo6 2y ago
I think it's relatively unlikely that having an agent write graph queries will outperform vector search against graph information outputted into text and then transformed into vectors. The related issue that I think is being conflated
2.
by jjfoooo6 2y ago
It's baffling in retrospect how Google couldn't recognize the strategic opportunity of Google Code.
3.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
I doubt flying in planes doing WW2 decreased fear of flying
4.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
A prominent new donor gets is responsible for a massive financial collapse and likely fraud, resulting in major losses for retail investors. Options are: 1. Claim ignorance of shady practices and disown donor. 2. Pull strings to avoid a rea
5.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
I'm not sure what baggage either prop came with other than being supportive of gambling
6.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
The ironic thing is that, as discussed in this thread, the article is really focused on upwardly mobile college graduates who have transitioned into marriage / kids. This fits me and my friend group to a T, but the bits about Facebook
7.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
Employee counts still being about 2018 is pretty cold comfort for someone looking for a job right now, especially if it's their first job. And if you think the wave of cuts has come and gone you are more optimistic than I am. Neverthel
8.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
It's pretty clear that "info from Sam" can't by trusted
9.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
"once you have a good VR / AR system, you no longer need to buy phones or TV's or many other physical objects" I'd really love to know what "other physical objects" Zuckerberg has in mind here.
10.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
The odd piece of this is characterizing VR as a bridge to AR from the user's perspective. An AR that is out of the way when you don't want it is somewhat plausible, but for most people the idea of strapping a VR headset to your fa
11.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
What I mean to convey by "well defined" is that even though the problem space of self driving cars is enormous, the success criteria of teaching a car to self drive is probably going to look pretty similar in 10 years to what it l
12.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
Elon completely miss the point in this exchange, which is that Twitter needs people like Stephen King far more than people like Stephen King need Twitter. Why should Stephen King care about how Twitter pays it's bills? The entire point
13.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
In other words, it is that it's going to be very difficult for users to intuitively understand what "half ads" means and why they should pay for it. It's a completely nonsensical compromise. Musk's product ideas for
14.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
AI as practiced in self driving cars is dramatically different than what is practiced in bot detection. Self driving has a well defined, static problem space, with inputs that don't change often (how often do they come out with a new s
15.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
We've gotten quite a few public comments from Musk on what he plans to do with Twitter, and they indicate total cluelessness from a product and engineering point of view. There's nothing to indicate an appreciation for the unique
16.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
I'm curious as to how existing Twitter employees get compensated after the sale. Do they have to stay for some amount of time to collect payouts on their shares? These actions only make logical sense if the goal is to make life unpleas
17.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
I also own a Tesla and I'd rate their user facing software at a C+ at best. It's better than the competition, sure, but the competition is legacy auto manufacturers with no tradition of expertise in software. Examples: the mobile
18.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
A chicken and egg problem of data acquisition. If I'm a user, why would I share data to such a service without concrete services to unlock? If I'm a service provider, why would I pay for a service without users? Really such data i
19.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
Three different flavors of big bet. Meta realizing their core business, while massive, has peaked, loudly reorienting their business around a dubious moonshot bet. Google burning cash in a moonshot division, dubiously betting that creating
20.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
There's nothing anyone appreciates more than a listening ear to unsolicited advice on the internet :) Thanks for the clip, Bill Burr is hilarious
21.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
I'm 35, am in therapy, just got out of a breakup, and have two good friends with a dads who divorced their moms at around your age. Since you've been receptive to my other comments I'll share a bit about how your comment stri
22.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
Consider also a couples therapist, all the same rationale applies. In either case, read up on the process for finding one that works you (and maybe your partner). Make sure it's someone you respect. There's a wide variety in quali
23.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
I'm a bit older (35) and what I've come to view about my earlier relationships is that I didn't invest much in them. Didn't share my feelings, didn't make myself vulnerable. At the time I thought I just wasn't
24.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
> I would like to start living life as I would like it, both career and relationship wise If you'd be comfortable sharing, why do you feel this is not something you can achieve with your partner?
25.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
I was mistaken about the loan term, I assumed they were typical "pay in 4" loans. That does sound quite bad.
26.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
Coinbase is in just a weird no man's land. If your bull case for crypto is replacing the US dollar as the world's dominant currency, why wouldn't some exchange in a regulation-free tax haven come to dominate, rather than a US
27.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
> borrowers slowly approach insolvency These are 4 week loans, exposure to any given customer is small. And in a recession demand for these loans will increase.
28.
by jjfoooo6 4y ago
It really seems like this "no PR" idea is having a moment on HN. I can't tell if it's just engagement bait contrarianism or genuine. That any developer would trust themselves even to just not make simple typo's is b