jjaken

7 ms·

1.
by jjaken 3y ago
There actually is a trademark files for THREADS https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=87522273&caseType=SERIAL_...
2.
by jjaken 3y ago
Now compare mental energy
3.
by jjaken 3y ago
Does Musk still attract A+ pedigree? I wouldn’t be caught dead working for someone so tech illiterate.
4.
by jjaken 3y ago
I thought I knew all the vague definitions of woke but none fit the context clues in your sentences. What are you talking about?
5.
by jjaken 3y ago
Almost none of that is true
6.
by jjaken 3y ago
Physicians are some of the larger victims of this inflation, no? Also “they” are not doing anything with ACGME in general, that’s an entirely separate issue.
7.
by jjaken 3y ago
Yeah, threads.com is taken by a slack competitor
8.
by jjaken 3y ago
What are you going on about? That’s all nonsense.
9.
by jjaken 3y ago
I think the ambiguous display of these things on the store, when few other apps show this, is cause for questions and concern. Everything you just said is equally speculative.
10.
by jjaken 3y ago
It’s not from the article. It’s clearly stated on the app store page for Threads: https://imgur.com/a/Lk8Olb6
11.
by jjaken 3y ago
MANY. This is the most annoying case of confirmation bias. Climatologists make predictions in terms of probabilities. “If emissions go up X amount then we will see Y increase in likelihood of impact Z”. They can’t predict a specific future.
12.
by jjaken 3y ago
Yup. I’m not catholic anymore but it’s what I was taught too.
13.
by jjaken 3y ago
Yeah it’s a dream for me and I hope funding persists. I wish I had a good answer. I’m a late-stage PhD student and I work full time at a national lab that is doing this work. I ought to start gauging the job market for when I defend my diss
14.
by jjaken 3y ago
Depends on the dogma. For some christian sects the old testament is genuinely a fable. It isn’t necessarily the religion, or spirituality more generally, that is opposed to science or rationality, but the dogma and way the spirituality&#x2F
15.
by jjaken 3y ago
It’s multifaceted. Scientifically it’s too soon to say. Engineering-wise, it’s entirely doable. I’ve seen a couple talks in which they worked out how to do it with current technology and within budgets that are manageable by cooperating gov
16.
by jjaken 3y ago
That’s the one example anyone ever uses and it’s way oversimplified. It’s also something that occurred 400 years ago, conducted by a church that doesn’t exist anymore (the catholics have changed a lot in 400 years and the Inquisition has be
17.
by jjaken 3y ago
We might. I’m one scientist working on making sure we don’t. There are many scientists trying to do that. Hopefully we can learn and act in time.
18.
by jjaken 3y ago
Becomming an old programmer. Sounds like a joke but really, I felt super green until suddenly I didn’t. I didn’t really figure anything specific out, I’ve just now seen enough problems that I am confident I can work through whatever I run i
19.
by jjaken 3y ago
Times like this are when people can only speculate. There’s too little information for anything else. The discussion is tautologically speculative. Some will be optimistic and others will be pessimistic and the only thing informing the disp
20.
by jjaken 3y ago
Yeah debates in climate science are about phenomena laypeople don’t even know exist. It’s about how what we observe happens. No one is arguing about what we’re observing, eg global warming.
21.
by jjaken 3y ago
Oh interesting, I didn’t know that
22.
by jjaken 3y ago
The important part to understand is timescales. In a day, the Earth does absorb some energy. Of course it does, plants collect it, solar panels collect, the ocean and land collect it. The amount Earth collects is a tiny fraction of what it
23.
by jjaken 3y ago
Heat death doesn’t mean “no heat” or that energy has depleted. It just means that energy is fully dispersed. All kg the hear exists, it’s just that no one place has any more than anywhere else, and so there is no longer any transfer of ener