jinkylist

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jinkylist 11mo ago

   >I certainly wouldn’t use it after seeing them remove features. All sorts of projects remove features all the time though, even the linux kernel drops support for hardware that may or may not be in use somewhere >Their users are entit
2. 2.▲
   by jinkylist 11mo ago

   >It only works if everyone in the ecosystem is honest In general, applying this to anything with the general public, I don't expect it to work. This is why we have laws, licenses and rules in the first place. You can preach all you
3. 3.▲
   by jinkylist 11mo ago

   >I cannot imagine how this is used seriously when there is something like Ceph available. Adopting Ceph is adopting a Ceph engineer, any use-case with the need and funding to run Ceph on production would easily be able to pay for commerc
4. 4.▲
   by jinkylist 11mo ago

   Is it an excuse? Maintaining code costs money, and the previous versions are provided under the license, and you're free to modify it, pull selective patches and maintain them yourself. While It'd be convenient if the license was
5. 5.▲
   by jinkylist 11mo ago

   While not notifying of the change earlier is annoying, I also don't see anywhere stated that they're obligated to provide services in addition to just providing me the source. Moreover the build-instructions don't seem compli