jillyboel3

5 ms·

1.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
[flagged]
2.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
Which personal attack? You mean calling out americans? How is that personal? You also going to ban everyone here who posts disparaging generalizations about europeans? Because so far you haven't been. As for > Are you a shill, a tro
3.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
[flagged]
4.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
Have you never been on a 3 week vacation? Or even just a 2 week one with a day before/after where you didn't sit down to read your email? Apple apparently started their freakout after 15 days
5.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
where do you think their billions come from?
6.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
I'm running NodeRED and ESPHome in their own docker containers, integrated with home assistant, just fine. Never used supervisor. It's been a few years since I set them up so I don't remember the details but that also means i
7.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
not paying for a new phone in full does NOT warrant retaliatory action against all of the author's accounts. block the device, sure. send collections after him for the unpaid amount, sure. retaliating by blocking all his unrelated, pai
8.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
> Home Assistant has support for that remote option, and no others. It's literally just a reverse proxy. Set up any you like. Wireguard, cloudflare tunnel, caddy with a security plugin, the options are limitless.
9.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
I've been running home assistant in docker for years. Just the `homeassistant/home-assistant` image. Don't need anything more. Best I can tell is that the supervisor is for people who just wanted a managed home assistant in a
10.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
if 3 posts every hour before getting rate limited is spamming sure
11.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
Re-read the post we're commenting on please.
12.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
Terms that were illegal and thus not binding in many jurisdictions. If I were to write: "By replying to this comment you agree to my Terms of Service which require you to paypal me 10k", you would laugh and disregard it. Same thin
13.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
Of course not, but resulting changes to Apple's policy are still a good thing for everyone else. Anything that forces apple to bully other organizations and people less is a good thing.
14.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
> Why people try to defend Apple I'll never understand, my guess is some people who own an iPhone have decided that's 'their team' and who wants to see their team lose It's this. Apple somehow managed to cultivat
15.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
> I would also not want to do business with Epic So don't put yourself in the position where you have to do business with Epic, like forcing them to use your store to get software on the platform over a billion users use. Apple coul
16.
by jillyboel3 1y ago
No, apple is clearly the evil one. They are bullying many, many, many other companies and individiuals in a similar, and often even worse, fashion. Those don't speak up because they're afraid of Apple's wrath. Thankfully Epic