jijijijij

5 ms·

1.
by jijijijij 8d ago
Buddy, climate change alone is heavily hitting Europe, changing her landscape. Not to mention economic and political trouble brewing. Not sure where OP is from, but if the US attacks Europe OP may not be able to travel there at all.
2.
by jijijijij 8d ago
> Should I just say fuck it, and go hitchhiking across Europe with some friends? Yes. Assuming you are young and haven't had such experience. The world is changing not just because of AI. Everything is unstable right now. You may re
3.
by jijijijij 13d ago
That was unrelated. They do that every Thursday to see how it feels and if they might have become evil after all.
4.
by jijijijij 13d ago
As if you would know what to do without asking ChatGPT.
5.
by jijijijij 13d ago
This depends on the threat scenario. Sure, in Belgium or the US you won't see defense factories going underground any time soon. But Poland? Doing so already proved a valuable investment for Iran - even facing an enemy with an abundanc
6.
by jijijijij 15d ago
Have you seen Halt and Catch Fire ? It's really, really good television and may be your kinda thing thematically. Excellent soundtrack too.
7.
by jijijijij 15d ago
Every masterpiece or visionary work, which suffered late recognition is evidence against your proposal. If art is shaped by popular demand only, you will get nothing but the most comfortable, unchallenging, forgettable popculture fluff imag
8.
by jijijijij 15d ago
The primary value of AI is solving problems AI created and becoming an inefficient interfacing layer for things it made functionally obsolete.
9.
by jijijijij 15d ago
Yes, I also think cheap drones are somewhat of a pacifying development, similar to nuclear bombs, but available to pretty much any nation. (Although, I think ironically nuclear strikes become more likely now, because of drone asymmetry...)
10.
by jijijijij 15d ago
I meant defender, as in country being attacked. As in not the the aggressor. In the concrete instance of AA defense you are correct. You basically can't prevent drone damage actively, since every AA system can be easily overwhelmed and
11.
by jijijijij 15d ago
I don't want to derail this thread further. I meant 'objection' exclusively in relation to mandatory military service. People who object military service are imprisoned and psychologically tortured in Israel. The lines betwee
12.
by jijijijij 15d ago
I think they meant the kind of warfare cheap drones encourage. I believe they implied other means may result in quicker conflict resolution. I think the problem is, apart from deploying nuclear weapons, air-based warfare campaigns have neve
13.
by jijijijij 15d ago
I meant especially civilian services as alternative. Every human should have the right to decide, if they want the moral implications associated with the military. The military also shouldn't become a substitute civil infrastructure bl
14.
by jijijijij 15d ago
A draft would also likely enable/strengthen moral objection for soldiers. A professional army brings contractual obligations for any received benefits (e.g. education), which makes disobeying objectionable orders a question of dealing
15.
by jijijijij 15d ago
No one knows what NATO even means, if the US of all countries attacks a member state. Eg. there is no legal procedure for the US to leave NATO. There isn't really a NATO without the US. Although many countries would be advised to stand
16.
by jijijijij 16d ago
> The attacker could use `chattr -i .bashrc` with the same privileges before editing your bashrc. No. Setting flags requires root privileges, sudo was implied. At least on my system. > Also you will want to do the same to .profile (be
17.
by jijijijij 17d ago
Does 'chattr +i .bashrc' reliably prevent this? Always seemed sensible to me. Then again, there are a few files getting sourced by the shell and I am not sure I could spontaneously name them all.
18.
by jijijijij 18d ago
There would be tripwire forces located in Greenland. The US would likely be required to directly engage European troops. I would expect Europe to let the carrier know it got no chance before it even starts shit, in the above scenario. Like
19.
by jijijijij 18d ago
> It’s unlikely NATO members will fight the US with bullets and bombs, but I guarantee they can still seriously hurt them. I am not even sure the US would be able to completely dominate a conflict. While it obviously has the largest mili
20.
by jijijijij 18d ago
No. It's an anvil dropped onto the mouse. In this example, Signal itself and anyone associated with it, could not have any bank accounts at all. There wouldn't be any receiving end for donations. Being on the OFAC list means any b
21.
by jijijijij 19d ago
So if those prior sentences or yours are not related, your argument is part wrong, part irrelevant/nonsensical. Good talk.
22.
by jijijijij 19d ago
> It's based on three designated foreign terrorist organizations, notably the PKK. In this context, "designated foreign terrorist organizations" is not an explanation, but a tautology. The matter at hand is how and why so
23.
by jijijijij 19d ago
This isn't comparable to the legality issues in particular countries, a comparatively minor threat for FOSS software projects. If the US declares your organization as terrorist, you'll lose banking access globally by leveraging th
24.
by jijijijij 19d ago
This is about finances. If the US declares you a terrorist organization, you cannot do any banking anymore, even outside the US, since most banks do not want to gamble on SWIFT access. Since the US considers anything "antifa" as t
25.
by jijijijij 19d ago
Also these models are usually expensive. Cheap/low-end models don't have this option ever. Depending on the financial situation, the "just buy the alternative" may not be possible. Some people here need to touch grass, t
26.
by jijijijij 19d ago
IANAL, but consumers usually do have to finalize the installation, in particular activate the license online. From a legal perspective the technicality of a running kernel may not satisfy completion.
27.
by jijijijij 29d ago
> you could redirect 100% of memory production to consumer chips without enormous upheaval They would never do that. By then the market has changed and they would produce at the limit of expected demand, certainly not intentionally causi
28.
by jijijijij 29d ago
> but that's early enough to know this is 100% human trite bullshit It's also lacking the toaster dash. Clear bio-signature of the unaffected hearts and minds.
29.
by jijijijij 29d ago
Nice try, but it's generated slop all the way down, Mr. Feynman. The tech specs aren't safe either. Last year the official Google Store had some laughable AI translations in the specs for their Pixel phones. Eg. "Rear video&q
30.
by jijijijij 29d ago
That's what I suspected, but it's actually pretty weird to associate "rectum" as it's quite a dissimilar word, sharing nothing but a few letters. Like, "referendum" sounds like ass too? I mean weird, unle

More ›