jheez3

4 ms·

1.
by jheez3 9mo ago
Intelligence? No. Get the wording right. It’s driven by probability.
2.
by jheez3 9mo ago
Well until the weird nerds at uni created things like Google, Facebook and so on...
3.
by jheez3 9mo ago
Lol this argument doesn't hold weight. Do you really want to be an employee? Lets see what your reservation price is first. Im pretty sure you'd need to be paid a lot to forgo having control over your time and so on. Lets keep it
4.
by jheez3 9mo ago
Agreed. The preferential treatment is blatant and obvious. The fact that an old-timer like yourself comes forward and says it means that the newer people aren't nutters thinking it.
5.
by jheez3 9mo ago
"that have not fully manifested yet" This is not true.. "I find it utterly maddening how divorced STEM people have become from philosophical and ethical concerns of their work. I blame academia and the education system for cr
6.
by jheez3 9mo ago
Only those with great taste are well-equipped to make assertions about what we have infront of us. The rest is all noise and personally I just block it out.
7.
by jheez3 9mo ago
Thats all irrelevant. Is/was there tremendous value to be had by being able to transport data? Of course. No doubt about it. Everything else got figured out and investments were made because of that. The same line of thinking does not
8.
by jheez3 9mo ago
"I can see it delivering impact bigger than the internet itself. Both require a lot of investments." lol.... Just make sure you screenshot your post so you have a good reminder in a few years re. your predictive ability.
9.
by jheez3 9mo ago
"You don’t have a solid background. If you want to go around huffing and puffing your chest about a subject area, you kinda do fella. Credibility.
10.
by jheez3 9mo ago
I wish there was a way to discern posts from legit clever people from the not-so. Its annoying to see posts from people who lag behind in intelligence and just dont get it - people learn at different rates. Some see way further ahead.