jhart3333

6 ms·

1.
by jhart3333 12y ago
Really? You're a seasoned follower of Hacker News and you don't know who Lawrence Lessig is and what he's done?
2.
by jhart3333 12y ago
Clearly, I've offended you. But I don't know why?
3.
by jhart3333 12y ago
Okay then. Call me crazy. I tried to reach out to you across the chasm of differing ideologies. Is this all you've got? No comprende?
4.
by jhart3333 12y ago
Thank you for saying this. You are brave and beautiful.
5.
by jhart3333 12y ago
You call me a scold and accuse me of scapegoating. You claim that "no actions of any commenters here lead to Aaron's death" and imply that Aaron should have been able to survive the onslaught of financial ruin and the prospec
6.
by jhart3333 12y ago
Thank you. You give me hope.
7.
by jhart3333 12y ago
Is that all you are objecting to? The spelling of Aaron's name? Fixed by the way. I fixed Heymann's spelling too.
8.
by jhart3333 12y ago
You need to atone for your actions regarding Aaron Swartz sir. When I first arrived at Hacker News I happened upon a thread where Aaron was asking for help from his compatriots, his fellow hackers. What he got was a sharp stick in the eye.
9.
by jhart3333 12y ago
>> There is still no incentive to get paid in BTC How about no chargebacks? That seems to be a pretty big issue for anyone doing business on the internet.
10.
by jhart3333 12y ago
Thanks for speaking for me. Actually I would rather speak for myself. Try citing a study or some statistics next time.
11.
by jhart3333 12y ago
I've looked through your comments on this post and did not find anything that looked like an explanation or refutation of Lewis' claims that HFT were front running. Maybe I missed it or you were talking about another post. Why don
12.
by jhart3333 12y ago
>> But there's also the fact that American cities are war zones. That's an opinion claiming to be a fact.
13.
by jhart3333 13y ago
It's cheap until you have to grab a bunch of stuff back all at once. Then they have you by the short hairs.
14.
by jhart3333 13y ago
I'm sticking with strike. "mass resignation and everyone loses their jobs" just doesn't have the same ring.
15.
by jhart3333 13y ago
You mean everyone quit together? That's called a strike.
16.
by jhart3333 13y ago
They use the internet to collect the data.
17.
by jhart3333 13y ago
Dinosaurs were not cold blooded as it turns out. They live on today as birds.
18.
by jhart3333 13y ago
What I am saying is that you are accusing Schneier of setting up a straw man when in fact you and he have a difference of opinion. This is not a straw man. He left nothing out of his assertion. However you did. Care to respond to what I act
19.
by jhart3333 13y ago
Not really. It is usually used as a deceptive argument by one person. This is what you implied by leaving out all the people who supported his assertion.
20.
by jhart3333 13y ago
forgot to insert sarcasm tags
21.
by jhart3333 13y ago
"Back in June, when the contents of Edward Snowden's cache of NSA documents were just starting to be revealed and we learned about the NSA collecting phone metadata of every American, many people -- including President Obama -- di
22.
by jhart3333 13y ago
In case you forgot. Corporations ARE people.
23.
by jhart3333 13y ago
Thank you for your thoughtful and informative comment. This is what I read HN for.
24.
by jhart3333 13y ago
from Slashdot: "...I'm a co-founder of AntiPolygraph.org (we suggest using Tor to access the site)..."
25.
by jhart3333 13y ago
For me, it's not that The Atlantic is held in disdain but that Schneier is held in high esteem.
26.
by jhart3333 13y ago
bowlofpetunias' observation: "You are in a very small bubble. The rest of us 99.9% see it clearly." Look at some of the other comments in this thread. The entire rest of the world is talking about Snowden and the bad US behav
27.
by jhart3333 13y ago
I don't see your point. It's not an argument, it's an observation: "outside of your bubble, the rest of us see this clearly". Pretty much the opposite of what you are objecting to.
28.
by jhart3333 13y ago
They kidnapped his dog.
29.
by jhart3333 13y ago
This used to go by another name: it was called a jury.
30.
by jhart3333 13y ago
Occam's Razor? Really? No question of trust enters your mind?

More ›