jgfd99

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jgfd99 15y ago

   "civil disobedience is ok only if it causes just a small localized amount of inconvenience" I never stated that. Personally, I believe it's far more efficient and more ethical to use a court system and support your representatives than disr
2. 2.▲
   by jgfd99 15y ago

   "Your comment reads very mobbish." Explain what "mobbish" means in the context of my comment. Because I disagree with your position, my comment somehow resembles 'mob' behavior? "you can't go arguing that people should only disagree with yo
3. 3.▲
   by jgfd99 15y ago

   I don't think that analogy is fair. It's a denial of service. It's similar to going into an Apple Store or any other store, and blocking customer checkout registers, preventing customers from paying and receiving their goods. But instead of
4. 4.▲
   by jgfd99 15y ago

   You're comparing apples and oranges, and using straw man attacks. PayPal did not ban them on the basis of their race. PayPal was perfectly within the law to do what they did.
5. 5.▲
   by jgfd99 15y ago

   You're trolling, correct? If PayPal shuts down for an hour, it loses a lot of money (transaction costs, administrative costs, paying idle employees, etc.). Not just them, but millions of their customers who rely on PayPal for their business