jesterman

5 ms·

1.
by jesterman 2y ago
Yeah I’m surprised as well. Just searched it up here after seeing the news somewhere else…
2.
by jesterman 2y ago
One of the options is literally a trash can! https://new.mta.info/document/85441 Or perhaps... a subway seat? https://new.mta.info/document/85661
3.
by jesterman 3y ago
Do you have some sources for these? Can't find anything online.
4.
by jesterman 3y ago
Why do you say there are good odds of that?
5.
by jesterman 3y ago
I can’t find a link to the actual leak itself. Appears the documents were accidentally attached to some public court documents.
6.
Microsoft documents leak new Bethesda games, including an Oblivion remaster(theverge.com)
1 points by jesterman 3y ago|2 comments
7.
by jesterman 3y ago
From GitHub - Incident On 2023-06-29: https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/gqx5l06jjxhp?u=ry1xb4...
8.
by jesterman 3y ago
https://discord.gg/ukXPkeU9 I'm assuming they are talking about this.
9.
by jesterman 3y ago
Sounds like most of the value in that site is locked behind a two thousand dollar a year paywall… wow. The few articles you can see are interesting though.
10.
by jesterman 3y ago
As frob said, given the size of the company and the statistic they gave that 20% of the company was laid off. The company laid off at least 10 people, and as she said in the article, they were ALL minorities. This feels statistically unlike
11.
by jesterman 3y ago
It appears it was flagged again? I can't see it on the first 5 pages of the front pages of HN..
12.
by jesterman 3y ago
This is an incredible piece. The fact that the 20% of the company laid off were all minority groups is absolutely insane. LinkedIn says they have at minimum 50 employees, meaning at least 10 people were laid off. Here is their LinkedIn post
13.
by jesterman 3y ago
I believe the section of the comment you are referencing was on people who weren't in a union. So they can't have a union do it's job and negotiate a higher base salary because they aren't in a union.
14.
by jesterman 4y ago
9% is probably wrong, it was using an earlier figure of less than or about 1 billion, when the actual figure is more than 2 billion.
15.
by jesterman 4y ago
Not sure why, but that link isn't loading for me. https://archive.is/0ETzn
16.
by jesterman 4y ago
They will be paying just 9% of the market cap from a week ago. EDIT: This is likely wrong, it's probably more like 20+%, I was using the $.27 a stock from an earlier price of about 1 billion. It appears that the actual price is more th
17.
by jesterman 4y ago
Anyone willing to make a non-torrent link for this? I'm interested since I know they've done good work in the past.
18.
by jesterman 4y ago
I see what you are going with here for it not being able to come up with original things. But I think that falls apart when you realize almost nothing humans do is original, everything is just building on other things.
19.
by jesterman 4y ago
Is a disproportionate amount of money spent on very few children for theater and music?
20.
by jesterman 4y ago
He has moved it forward. https://www.coindesk.com/business/2023/02/03/craig-wrights-u... All developers can/will be served papers (and forced to travel to the UK?)
21.
by jesterman 4y ago
perplexity.ai/ specifically uses web sources to construct natural language. I believe it's going to be in Bing soon?
22.
by jesterman 4y ago
403 Forbidden?
23.
by jesterman 4y ago
Wait this place is related to startups? I know it's owned by Y Combinator and occasionally startups will place employment ads here. Is this meant to be the place where founders go?
24.
by jesterman 4y ago
I suspect it's actually leaking the prompt. You can do the same thing with ChatGPT. It's not a particularly big deal honestly, the important part is hosting it and getting an people to use your service.
25.
by jesterman 4y ago
You are correct, I’ve edited and removed it. Thank you for pointing that out.
26.
by jesterman 4y ago
From a cursory look the 1000 sample names seems legit, if it’s fake they at least did research to get plausible area codes for phones and some plausible domain names for some celebrities email addresses.
27.
by jesterman 4y ago
[DELETED BY USER] The below commenter is correct.
28.
by jesterman 4y ago
There definitely was, as they mentioned in the article. They choose not to though, opting instead to just sit on it for a long time I guess? Hopefully they talked to a lawyer before releasing this though, and hopefully Microsoft doesn’t go
29.
by jesterman 4y ago
This was a great article. It was absolutely not what I excepted going in. Hats off to Julian here, for doing what they think is “good” in the end.
30.
by jesterman 4y ago
Here is exactly what you wanted! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vl1w7kWRtDg

More ›