jessespears

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jessespears 9y ago

   This would take an extraordinary departure from our current politics. Government intruding on software would (rightly) cause cries from the most stalwart Free Software advocates and from proprietary software companies. Can you imagine the o
2. 2.▲
   by jessespears 10y ago

   The upper bound isn't limited by the number of dollars in circulation. The upper bound is limited by what's economically feasible. The outcome of the theoretical Alabama community college language teacher is that the language pr
3. 3.▲
   by jessespears 10y ago

   The company officers or agents who were served with the letter could be held personally liable for failure to comply with the order. I think it's a little unfair to expect employees to go to prison for contempt of court in defiance of
4. 4.▲
   by jessespears 10y ago

   > I can only question your sincerity. This is the mark of a viewpoint unfettered by exposure to the other side. Assuming malicious intent of someone just because they have an opposing viewpoint is simplistic and naive. 1. Manning leaks
5. 5.▲
   by jessespears 10y ago

   The paper that this article is derived from: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis-or-stem... I found the paper to be more detailed and have a higher signal:noise ratio.
6. 6.▲
   by jessespears 10y ago

   Fascinating: The Court of Appeals ruled that for a software licensee's violation of a contract to constitute copyright infringement, there must be a nexus between the license condition and the licensor’s exclusive right