jesse_ash

5 ms·

1.
by jesse_ash 21d ago
I like your idea of conversational tempo, it feels a little like a 'thinking' slider applied to a plan mode (how much back and forth vs. "rigor" you want at a given moment). Might be a good candidate for a pi extension.
2.
by jesse_ash 27d ago
Personally, I had to go back to Opus 4.6 after I felt what I thought were some early onset signs of psychosis. It seems ridiculous to type, that a model could have this effect on my mental health, but my quality of life and enjoyment of wor
3.
by jesse_ash 27d ago
Yes. Every single response has this level of _serious_ detail (the kind you'd only go into when you really need someone to understand something).
4.
by jesse_ash 2mo ago
> The UI of git directly reflects its internals Maybe?
5.
by jesse_ash 3mo ago
Love this idea and will be following closely! I've wanted a pair programmer style interaction for a while now. Something closer to VSCode's Copilot inline conversations and FIM, but where it's continuously watching what I&#x2
6.
by jesse_ash 4mo ago
Those looking for a one sentence answer will be the quickest to invest. When people talk about the harms of AI, this is the kind of thing that comes to mind first for me.
7.
by jesse_ash 4mo ago
IMO the assumption is probably that, with LLMs generally, software complexity and surface area going up faster than we're tackling it through hardening, testing, etc. - even with the help of defensive models. I would also imagine bad
8.
by jesse_ash 5mo ago
It was a bit misleading in terms of the audibility of infrasonic noise, but I think he did a good job of highlighting some of the effects of infrasonic noise on QoL/health with the study towards the end. IIRC, he also recorded some reg