jennyholzer2

6 ms·

1.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
At the start of 2025 I stopped buying Spotify and started buying Apple Music because I felt manipulated by the Spotify application's metrics-first design. I felt that Spotify was trying to teach me to rely on its automated recommendati
2.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
reads more like propaganda.
3.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
> Does your clairvoyance go any further than 2027? why are you so sensitive?
4.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
ChatGPT and Claude Code are industrial strength fans designed to blow smoke up your ass at rates once thought impossible
5.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
this is why I say "AI is for idiots"
6.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
0.1x
7.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
you're putting words in my mouth. i said the big STUPID neural nets.
8.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
This was a good faith observation. In my experience, AI users are meaningfully stupider and more gullible than the rest of the population.
9.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
"i'm happy to smoke crack while the dealer is paying for it"
10.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
0.1x
11.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
it's not an insult, it's an observation
12.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
> The idea that LLMs make subtle mistakes that are somehow more subtle, insidious and uncatchable compared to any random 25 pull requests you get from humans is simply ridiculous. This is plainly true, and you are just angry that you don
13.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
i feel my coworkers who use AI are slower, stupider, and less trustworthy than my coworkers who don't.
14.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
0.1x
15.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
0.1x
16.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
This guy's knowledge of art history is the Dada wikipedia page and the Banksy movie from 20 years ago. Allow me to repeat myself: AI is for idiots.
17.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
> I'd add a link to where I copied it from LLMs can't do this. Your code is unambiguously better than any LLM code if you can comment a link to the stackoverflow post you copied it from.
18.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
no hate but i would try to fire someone for saying that
19.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
From my vantage I would argue LLMs make good devs around 0.65x more productive
20.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
LLMs have dramatically empowered sociopath software developers. If you are sufficiently motivated to appear more "productive" than your coworkers, you can force them to review thousands of lines of incorrect AI slop code while you
21.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
my point is that embedding-shape's reading comprehension and/or language skills are too weak for him to safely use LLM technology.
22.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
In my experience Google's AI summaries are consistently accurate when retrieving technical information. In particular, documentation for long-lived, infrequently changing software packages tends to be accurate. If you ask Google about
23.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
no one said you can't turn on the radio and start listening to static
24.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
> capitalism is essentially evil even though nearly every post on this website makes this point, the commenters here really do not like it when you state this explicitly.
25.
by jennyholzer2 9mo ago
I seriously doubt that there is even one "AGI evangelist" who has the intellectual capacity to read books written for adult audiences.