jeltz

6 ms·

1.
by jeltz 3d ago
I would rather listen to someone with current merits than someone who has not produced anything notable in years. Especially if the topic is current trends in software development.
2.
by jeltz 3d ago
But as he has little to show the last decades we have very little reason to listen to him over some random blogger.
3.
by jeltz 4d ago
I eat whole cherries, I am too lazy to spit out the pits do I swallow them whole. So far it has not been any issue at all and I eat a lot of cherries.
4.
by jeltz 4d ago
Maybe the marketing pitch, like many other pitches, was a lie?
5.
by jeltz 4d ago
In Rust variables are not destroyed after the last borrow ends but instead when it goes out of scope. I guess that is why it us called borrow checking.
6.
by jeltz 7d ago
To me that is not a credit thing because this removes a piece evidence for the ability of AI to come up with novel ideas while still making it a useful tool.
7.
by jeltz 9d ago
The agents still write bad code unless my colleagues and the people who submit PRs to the repos I am responsible for somehow use agents from last year. And, no, it is not a question about style or preferences, the code is messy and contains
8.
by jeltz 9d ago
Actually rich people think they re helping more than that. If we assume the average length of a recurring donation is 6 months they feel they help 8 dollars for every 2 they donate. But otherwise you are right, this is done because it makes
9.
by jeltz 9d ago
Any rules for how quickly you can cancel one and it still counts as recurring?
10.
by jeltz 11d ago
I do not think it is the right choice for any repository or developer. It just seems like terrible advice.
11.
by jeltz 13d ago
LLMs love overcomplicating things so that is to be expected.
12.
by jeltz 14d ago
Historically thet have done so but I have no idea if thet currently do.
13.
by jeltz 15d ago
It writes like me when I was 14 and thought I was very smart.
14.
by jeltz 15d ago
Still more useful than what exists now.
15.
by jeltz 15d ago
They have a big library of music from tiny bands and it works well enough. As long as you ignore the music they try to push it just works.
16.
by jeltz 17d ago
Yeah, the idea is over 25 years old here in Europe and is called "betting exchange". Their only innovation is getting it regulated as commodity trading rather than online gambling.
17.
by jeltz 17d ago
At least it works unlike Starship. But yes both SLS and Starship are handouts to political donors.
18.
by jeltz 20d ago
Because there is zero reason to sell off parts of FIFA to external investors. FIFA is rich and profitable and can fund everything themselves with cash or loans.
19.
by jeltz 20d ago
The reason is that one allows you to destroy harvests and ecosystems while the other does not.
20.
by jeltz 21d ago
It would be way less and risk would be lower (It is hard to reach one 9 no matter how bad you are at it), and self hosting is not the only option.
21.
by jeltz 21d ago
The site used to not be under constant assault of low effort LLM submissions and low effort LLM comments. That people start getting cranky about that is just normal.
22.
by jeltz 21d ago
He would wear a leotard because he is a wrestler.
23.
by jeltz 23d ago
And those people were idiots. MOSS was trivial to implement and an improvement of what was there before. I implemented it myself for our company.
24.
by jeltz 23d ago
Probably not, I think it is mostly real people who upvote based on just the headline with reading it just because the headline agrees with their worldview.
25.
by jeltz 23d ago
No, while the patent poster expresses their opinion quite strongly I have more than once encountered product managers and project managers who get almost personally offended when developers try to use their brains and don't just blindl
26.
by jeltz 27d ago
In my experience it is the semi literate people who love generative AI the most. The people who struggled to form sentenced and hated reading.
27.
by jeltz 27d ago
Yeah, I have started ignoring AI generated stuff.
28.
by jeltz 28d ago
I am much more interested in it now that it is not a subset of Python. That felt like something which would hold it back and seems like they agreed.
29.
by jeltz 1mo ago
Whenever people stop creating new language with significant indentation. I don't complain about it in Python but I hate when this bad idea is introduced in more places.
30.
by jeltz 1mo ago
But in this case it is the other way round, failure rate is going up.

More ›