jdiff

7 ms·

91.
by jdiff 2mo ago
I do know how git works and in my experience, while the version number sometimes doesn't get bumped until just before a release is tagged, the version number comes from the codebase. If they're building something that says 1.4.0,
92.
by jdiff 2mo ago
That commit (and main) still purports to be 1.3.14, the version numbers haven't changed. Does that not still suggest Anthropic is using something else?
93.
by jdiff 2mo ago
> they did put the bun 1.4.0 version bump in the changelogs for claude code a while ago, over a month almost. Where? Is see no CHANGELOG in the root. I do see LATEST, last modified 2 months ago, and it says 1.3.14
94.
by jdiff 2mo ago
That PR is the rust rewrite. That's some time in the past now. As of this comment, there is no tagged 1.4 release. This is the present. Anthropic is using apparently a version of Bun that is not publicly available. This is orthogonal t
95.
by jdiff 2mo ago
There were very many open pull requests from the community that were all invalidated overnight for something that same community was assured was merely an experiment. The normal process would be "hey, this experiment is going well, we&
96.
by jdiff 2mo ago
Similar, but with better typography and responsiveness. I like actual code being present here but the majority of the challenge is just reading anything, especially when zooming does absolutely nothing.
97.
by jdiff 2mo ago
This site doesn't. Many don't.
98.
by jdiff 2mo ago
No? There are many things you are not allowed to say when advertising, many ways in which you are not allowed to advertise. Fraud is not legal, and I have yet to see anyone make a free speech case for it.
99.
by jdiff 2mo ago
> The highscores don't show the run's duration, aka the error margin Different durations have different high score lists.
100.
by jdiff 2mo ago
No, Tangled's ATProto relationship and its social features are just the only differentiating factors. They mirrored their repo somewhere else. An additional location does not make it less friendly.
101.
by jdiff 2mo ago
Project's still on Github, it hasn't migrated or anything.
102.
by jdiff 2mo ago
They're still on GitHub. This isn't any sort of official transition. It's just now also on this other ATProto-based forge.
103.
by jdiff 2mo ago
Yes, a pox on othersite, all hail currentsite.
104.
by jdiff 2mo ago
I severely doubt the world ever gets to such a point that the entire world melts into AI hallucination. And token consumption depends on so many other things, it's not all that deterministic either.
105.
by jdiff 2mo ago
The entire directory (not repo) and all repo history regardless of secrets or instructions otherwise is not needed for faster cache access. I'm not going to say that this was intentional exfiltration. Sneaky motivations are not needed
106.
by jdiff 2mo ago
It certainly is, but what does OpenAI have to do with Grok Build?
107.
by jdiff 2mo ago
That's what they did to upload a repo, the question is why they would upload the user's entire repo in the first place. The idea itself is egregious, and the implementation was horrifying on top of that.
108.
by jdiff 2mo ago
This is in headlines, dude. This smear attempt is intellectually dishonest and eyeroll inducing.
109.
by jdiff 2mo ago
Wasn't thinking of H100s either. I spoke of infrastructure support, and I was being literal. A herd of GB200s needs a building built to stringent specifications to house them.
110.
by jdiff 2mo ago
They're not filling datacenters with 3090s. With the amount of headache and the amount of infrastructure needed to support those beasts, do they even have a resale price at all? Or just scrap value?
111.
by jdiff 2mo ago
To some degree at least. This is a hulking monster of a codebase for what it does, it's definitely LLM-built and almost definitely requires an LLM to tackle at all.
112.
by jdiff 2mo ago
No other model is so easy to generate such things. No model is so negligent in adding safeguards. I've seen it generate such things in response to a post that was clearly labeled as a 4th grader. The person you are talking to is respon
113.
by jdiff 2mo ago
I see your hamfisted cropping of my quote to downplay xAI's actions, since you brought up intellectual honesty. Why do we have to quantity badness? The question you posed was what has xAI done to be perceived as untrustworthy? Stop try
114.
by jdiff 2mo ago
In no way are you being intellectually honest if you think that hamfisted system prompt push to prod manipulation was an attempt to squash bias. And again, whataboutism doesn't make xAI better because others are doing bad, too. You ask
115.
by jdiff 2mo ago
Starkly different. One was a well meaning attempt to squash model bias gone wrong, the other is a deliberately inserted bias. Even ignoring all that, whataboutism is not persuasive.
116.
by jdiff 2mo ago
It's not ad hominem. The head is a strongly polarizing individual. People working for him must either be gravely apathetic or at least of a similar polarity.
117.
by jdiff 2mo ago
https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/05/xais-grok-suddenly-cant-s...
118.
by jdiff 2mo ago
That's cool. Others are not like you and may have use/need of things that you have no use/need for is what I'm trying to communicate here.
119.
by jdiff 2mo ago
I've used it before to access my tailnet machines through a browser on a machine I can't download software on.
120.
by jdiff 2mo ago
Won't you suffer from muscle atrophy in a such a low-G environment?

More ›