jdiff

6 ms·

121.
by jdiff 2mo ago
Not sure that last one rings true. There are entire languages with no allowed unused variables (some without prepending a _ to the names) that people love to develop with. In the industry, how often is it that a tool/language is picked
122.
by jdiff 2mo ago
I don't see any hate in these references. Perhaps just truths you don't want to hear. I've seen your name pop up multiple times in past conversations about V in response to anything less than positive. What's your involv
123.
by jdiff 2mo ago
Vlang is a ridiculous project that was entirely driven by hype that should have been easy for all to see straight through. It is ridiculous that it got $800/month with nothing to show for it. I haven't seen any hate spread for i
124.
by jdiff 2mo ago
Yes, the lack of whelm in all cases is what makes it impressive that it worked at all in this case.
125.
by jdiff 2mo ago
They likely had the qualifier, as does GP, that it was the last country "in the Americas."
126.
by jdiff 2mo ago
Why would they be trained to read a research experiment that fundamentally goes against the way they perceive? They can't train on this technique, they can only postprocess it into a form they can perceive.
127.
by jdiff 2mo ago
I explicitly prompt my small local models to channel that kind of energy. It's one of few ways to get them to just spit it out without yapping on about temperature- and humidity-appropriate activities when I just asked if it'll ra
128.
by jdiff 2mo ago
Even in real pregnancies, it's estimated that as many as three quarters of all fertilized eggs fail to implant in the uterus. If one was of the opinion that life begins at conception, one should certainly be aware of that silent holoca
129.
by jdiff 2mo ago
No, I'm satisfied with my own experience. If you would like to see data, take action towards those ends.
130.
by jdiff 2mo ago
Oh I certainly believe them. And on some level I admire the dogfooding. It just seems awful foolish of them.
131.
by jdiff 2mo ago
The minimal human supervision for prompts seems like a pretty silly take. LLMs are still pretty bad at creating good prompts for LLMs. Give it a benchmark and some feedback and it can brute force it, but far less effectively. And I thought
132.
by jdiff 2mo ago
Honesty has become a big tell, especially if its brutal. I'm not sure if it's getting worse or if I'm becoming more sensitive, but if I'm being brutally honest I can barely stand using LLMs anymore with their tone and th
133.
by jdiff 2mo ago
The obnoxious cliche is mine, although I wouldn't call it "regular speech" since I tacked on that dense blob of LLMisms intentionally.
134.
by jdiff 2mo ago
But in that case you have nobody but yourself to blame, and you can stabilize things yourself at any time by refraining from making any changes. You won't be surprised by a provider. Honestly? That's not just valuable—it's es
135.
by jdiff 2mo ago
An n-deep chain of monitors doesn't really have any defense that an (n-1)-deep chain of monitors has. None of them have the capacity to separate data and instructions. All you're doing is (in some ways) giving the model more rolls
136.
by jdiff 2mo ago
I imagine the challenge comes from recognizing that your model is trying to call a tool before it actually has and only constraining output then. Running a separate pass for an optionally-empty list of tools afterwards may work, but maybe c
137.
by jdiff 3mo ago
Those are pretty clearly delineated as user-generated content, and also aren't able to be modified to include information that the malicious user doesn't have another way of accessing.
138.
by jdiff 3mo ago
It opens a can of worms for them if they do consider prompt injection a bug because there's ultimately no defense. If they accept this, there are instantly hundreds of other moles they now have to whack or pay out for. Or dismiss them
139.
by jdiff 3mo ago
I think they know it'll hurt goodwill. I think they don't think they have to care what other people think about them. I think they think they're too big to fail.
140.
by jdiff 3mo ago
Feather has a charging circuit on board, and its usb port has a channel carved out for it and is close to the edge
141.
by jdiff 3mo ago
Just a lithium battery.
142.
by jdiff 3mo ago
This screen is entirely independent, with its own power source, so unlike most bistable screens this one could also report when its connection with the Machine is lost, and in a different way than simply turning off.
143.
by jdiff 3mo ago
You're not modding a pre-built $1049 device. The faceplates are removable and swappable with no disassembly needed, and this fancy one connects via bluetooth and is powered via a battery. Entirely non-invasive.
144.
by jdiff 3mo ago
No, that's not how LLMs work. It's all probabilities, and that issue has only deepened with providers silently falling back to worse models if they suspect you might be distilling their models. If an LLM rolls a bad token that can
145.
by jdiff 3mo ago
Is this a joke you're attempting? You're raging out about someone else being so narcissistic for not letting you continue on with your whole entire life because they took a vacation?
146.
by jdiff 3mo ago
I don't even know how we got here. This isn't that deeply represented in the training data. Is this what RLHF hath wrought? A new dialect of English based on corporatespeak and influencers, two heavy-hitting bullshitters?
147.
by jdiff 3mo ago
Some of them, the more corporate or tech-focused ones like .ai or .inc or .tech or .llc. Very many of them are comparable within a dollar of .org.
148.
by jdiff 3mo ago
Facebook has their own sins crawling on their backs, yes.
149.
by jdiff 3mo ago
It waxes and it wanes, but people breathlessly asking Grok "IS THIS TRUE??" is prevalent. People often call on Grok to argue their points for them. The interaction is inflicted.
150.
by jdiff 3mo ago
That's the joke of RFC 3514. Setting the evil bit of a packet to 0 means it is harmless and no defensive action should be taken. Secure systems should defend against packets with the evil bit set to 1. Insecure systems may choose to cr

More ›