jdasdf

5 ms·

1.
by jdasdf 4mo ago
I'm my experience claude code is kind of shit. Pi works very well with deepseek though
2.
by jdasdf 4mo ago
> The big flaw in his argument is that a mere 1% which is actually 20% of annual return is still less than the average income tax rate on workers This is untrue btw 50% of people in the US pay effectively no net taxes
3.
by jdasdf 4mo ago
>If that is what is being targeted, then why not actually target that. Apply some percent taxation on the current value of all assets transferred because of death. That already exists. The rate is 40% of the asset value.
4.
by jdasdf 4mo ago
As per the thread, the hardware is bricked and requires a full OS reinstall
5.
by jdasdf 4mo ago
The comentator either wasn't talking about the company as a whole, or was mistaken. This is public information. Their financial statements show clearly that they made a loss every single year since the data is available. https:/&
6.
by jdasdf 4mo ago
CEOs are democratically elected. And if they do a bad job they are democratically removed from office. What are you talking about??
7.
by jdasdf 4mo ago
>For instance - If overhiring happened, how is this not at least a little bit on the individual that approved of a hiring spree? Why is it that they should be able to yield a baton that hurts the workers they hired, without having to act
8.
by jdasdf 4mo ago
Why should people who are profitable to employ be laid off as well? It just sounds like you're upset and want to hurt whoever you feel is responsible for making you upset. That's not a productive stance to have on important topics
9.
by jdasdf 4mo ago
They don't have a PE ratio. They have never made a profit.
10.
by jdasdf 4mo ago
Cloudflare has never made a profit. Is your stance that shareholders should perpetually subsidize it out of the goodness of their hearts?
11.
by jdasdf 5mo ago
While that does sound interesting, I don't see any benefit for me. It would still ultimately exfiltrate the data outside of my control, and frankly i don't trust any "secure enclave" tech. As far as i'm concerned ph
12.
by jdasdf 5mo ago
I just use the API directly. It's simple enough to setup and i like the control i get from just charging up and not having to worry about any random subscription taking money out of my account
13.
by jdasdf 5mo ago
I've been using v4 pro for the past few days and honestly in terms of quality it seems more or less on par with open AIs 5.4 or opus 4.6 (i havent tried 4.7) To be clear, i'm not doing state of the art stuff. I mostly used it for
14.
by jdasdf 5mo ago
You request the judge to apply a lien on their assets. You take that to their bank and request that it be applied, and the money paid out. If that doesn't work, you can always go to the police/bailiff with the court order and sche
15.
by jdasdf 5mo ago
Such censorship shouldn't exist in the first place.
16.
by jdasdf 5mo ago
most laws enforce agreements.
17.
by jdasdf 6mo ago
thats the point
18.
by jdasdf 6mo ago
It is that easy. Those regulations are choices. You can make different choices. You can make them tomorrow. I'm sorry but i cannot take seriously any problem that essentially boils down to "We want it to be like this".
19.
by jdasdf 6mo ago
>But it does show a number of problems inherent in Germany's current situation: (a) shortage of skilled laborers; (b) high cost of labor; and (c) exorbitantly much red tape. These three points alone are among the most frequently cit
20.
by jdasdf 6mo ago
>but at least £200bn will be sucked out of the UK economy back to investors That's not how the economy works... Nothing gets "sucked out of the economy", and certainly not a productive investment that generated that income
21.
by jdasdf 7mo ago
i agree.
22.
by jdasdf 7mo ago
> HR on the surface seems unimportant, but you’d notice if the company stopped having health insurance or sending your taxes to the IRS etc etc. Interesting on how the very example you give for "oh this job isn't really bullshi
23.
by jdasdf 7mo ago
>You can't stockpile nurses and save them up for when you retire. But you can? It's called paying nurses more to encourage greater supply...
24.
by jdasdf 7mo ago
>Well, the current situation is equally effectively unfunded because you’ve got gains in an investment account that will be competing for a rapidly shrinking working age population in concert with large amounts of voters who don’t have i
25.
by jdasdf 7mo ago
Most pensions are Pay as You Go systems where no investment actually occurs (or if it does it is vestigial). Effectively no different from a regular ponzi scheme being used to purchase votes. Self-investment has the actual investment there.
26.
by jdasdf 7mo ago
>Public pensions and family benefits may seem old-fashioned compared with asset-based solutions. But they provide security without locking households into markets, without generating trillion-dollar investment pools, and without driving
27.
by jdasdf 8mo ago
Private payrolls are published though.
28.
by jdasdf 8mo ago
Because* This is a result of subsidies distorting market prices and encouraging malinvestment.
29.
by jdasdf 8mo ago
>It’s too late, those promises have been made. We have to lie in the bed we made. Yes, that involves treating it like pyramid schemes are treated. That means: - Arresting those involved in making them - Reclaiming all funds paid out - Re
30.
by jdasdf 8mo ago
Perhaps if people were burned for trusting electoral promises, they would be more mindful of their sustainability. Stop justifying pyramid schemes.

More ›