jaythvv

14 ms·

1.
by jaythvv 3y ago
I really don't understand the panic. The target is big tech, not open source. Think of GDPR: this goes primarily after big tech with big fines. What liability can be applied to software you don't pay for?
2.
by jaythvv 3y ago
It really won't. It's targeted at corporations, especially big tech, not open source where there is no money. If anything, it will likely toss more resources to open source by those very same big tech companies, to protect their l
3.
by jaythvv 4y ago
how dystopian and cyberpunk - where the identity and background of the worker is erased, and hiding from customers that their call is handled by someone abroad. This is evil, and exploitative
4.
by jaythvv 4y ago
yes
5.
by jaythvv 4y ago
all this, plus recommending videos it already shows me i watched, and return soon after having marked them "not interested/already watched the video"
6.
by jaythvv 6y ago
i like this - it still shows someone cares. It feels genuine to me. At least it makes your day a little bit more pleasant
7.
by jaythvv 7y ago
- Huelights control - PiHole - NFC card hacking - ARM assembly programming - Kubernetes + OpenFaas cluster - Postgres DB (with SSD harddrive)
8.
by jaythvv 9y ago
Probably the most egregious example would be Weev/Andew Auernheimer and AT&T https://www.wired.com/2013/03/att-hacker-gets-3-years/ https://www.wired.com/2014/04/att-hacker-
9.
by jaythvv 9y ago
This is excellent
10.
by jaythvv 9y ago
Everything about this project is weird. I started looking into it since I do IoT stuff and there was so much hype. Then you find out about the curl issue. The unnecessary ternary. Read the white paper and all issues with tip selection was &