jaysoo

5 ms·

1.
Typed React and Redux(jaysoo.ca)
13 points by jaysoo 11y ago|0 comments
2.
When Learning, Attitude and Approach Matter(jaysoo.ca)
1 points by jaysoo 11y ago|0 comments
3.
Why You Should Care About Flux(jaysoo.ca)
1 points by jaysoo 11y ago|0 comments
4.
by jaysoo 13y ago
Updated the post with timing numbers. I want to note that the numbers can be deceiving though because they use different mechanisms to record elapsed time. When I ran the same task though Unix `time` I got numbers that were much closer, alt
5.
Grunt vs Gulp – Beyond the Numbers(jaysoo.ca)
2 points by jaysoo 13y ago|2 comments
6.
Creating Semantic, Reusable Directives in AngularJS(jaysoo.ca)
1 points by jaysoo 13y ago|0 comments
7.
by jaysoo 14y ago
Yeah I know. It was just a quick example. It's useful for something like: f = (options) -> options.foo or= 'bar' # ...
8.
by jaysoo 14y ago
I myself enjoy using CoffeeScript, but I understand it might not be for everyone. It's always good to look at the pro/cons before choosing a language, so I think discussions like this is good. That being said, some of the problems this arti
9.
by jaysoo 15y ago
Is it really that strange? Those statements are basically (as per ECMA-262 11.9.3): 0 === Number('0') 0 === Number('') '0' === ''
10.
by jaysoo 16y ago
If this was socialism then either the government or the public would own Bell/Rogers/Telus. This is also not free-market capitalism. I'm not sure what you would call it.
11.
by jaysoo 16y ago
The big deal here is that instead of offering competitive plans the big ISPs are _decreasing_ the level of service and _increasing_ the prices of plans. Also, Bell/Rogers/Telus have the advantage of offering bundles if you use them for cabl
12.
by jaysoo 16y ago
Not exactly the same signature, but can handle arbitrary number of calls. var say = (function() { var savedArgs = []; return (function recurse () { if (arguments.length) { for (var i=0, arg; arg=arguments[i]
13.
by jaysoo 16y ago
The goal could be CSRF instead of actually reading the cookies. If there's a SessionID cookie for example, you can use JS to GET/POST the request to the server without needing to know the value of SessioID because the browser will send it a
14.
by jaysoo 16y ago
No problem. It's one of those things developers don't realize when coming from C-style languages. :)
15.
by jaysoo 16y ago
Blocks in JavaScript do not create scopes. This is different from many other languages (like Java or C). In fact, Crockford has mentioned this as well: http://javascript.crockford.com/code.html "JavaScript does not have block scope, so de
16.
by jaysoo 16y ago
In the case of closure, yes you will take a small performance hit. But the example given is still invalid because the only scope present is the function-scope (for-loop doesn't create new scope). For example, if you ran the code below in Fi
17.
by jaysoo 16y ago
> #13 In any code block, store local references to out-of-scope variables. That doesn't even make sense. The for-loop block doesn't create a new scope, so it's perfectly valid to refer to the variable `a`. Plus, even if you create a new