jatora

5 ms·

1.
by jatora 5d ago
", but eventually you need to sell things for at least what it costs to make them." Gmail, and every other free service would like a word. Net tangential profit invalidates your point. They can loss lead LLM's forever if they
2.
by jatora 5d ago
Do you have any basis for this collection of claims? I've never heard of this intentional obfuscation.
3.
by jatora 5d ago
Thankfully due to AI, it is an extremely simple matter to set up your own HN feed and filter it absolutely however you want
4.
by jatora 8d ago
Imagine being front and center to the development of a major revolutionary tech.. and ur solution to it being too dangerous is to not be involved.. so a. your ability to steer it safely is killed b. the % of people invovled in it that care
5.
by jatora 9d ago
Well one way to look at it is: As a programmer, but working in two non-SWE roles, I have turned job A 70% over to AI, and job B 90%. Where systems and scaffolds can be put in place to manage various aspects of a job, would this not be consi
6.
by jatora 12d ago
easy. "claude, get this c++ program working" these types of moats are all but obliterated.
7.
by jatora 12d ago
When people say they have been in startups for long periods, does this mean they worked at a chain of failed companies?
8.
by jatora 12d ago
goal post shift.
9.
by jatora 13d ago
More fuel to why the AA index is fairly pointless. Gemini 3.8 flash is 59 and opus 5 is 63? grok 4.6 is 61 too? And in the past, gemini 3 pro was rated as high as opus 4.5 and the like Their AA Intelligence Index is just simply not indicat
10.
by jatora 14d ago
i know... i suffered through a long load but im not logging in without having even a semblance of clue what the game even is unfortunately
11.
by jatora 18d ago
Glad someone caught the reference. Too bad that someone completely whooshed the joke lol. And I don't need my LLM's to master the universe, just to be better than most humans at what I need done. Almost there.
12.
by jatora 18d ago
Youre just arguing against your own point now. My analogy is a fine reproduction of the failure of the 'just a token predictor' argument. To predict the next token requires many other interesting things to also be understood and m
13.
by jatora 19d ago
this made me laugh even though i dont think i even get it. can you explain this please lol
14.
by jatora 20d ago
Yours is exactly the right intuition imo. If you presuppose certain key aspects of materialism, non-dualism, functionalism, objectivism, perhaps absolute determinism... and then layer on a good general grasp of neurobiology, chemistry, cosm
15.
by jatora 20d ago
Oh so you're saying the biological imperative that underlies all human function, upon which all other emergent functions have sprung from, isn't actually the correct way to characterize human capability and is over-reductive..and
16.
by jatora 20d ago
Care to post your shorts? lol
17.
by jatora 21d ago
Humans are just baby replicators. The civilizations are what's getting uncanny. It's good the 'just token predictors' crowd is starting to pivot and hedge though lol. 'It's just the harness!' uh huh. give
18.
by jatora 26d ago
I think this definitely applies to fable/opus/sol, mixed with the undeterministic nature of the models. But those claiming Qwen are just outright coping. Thats nonsense imo
19.
by jatora 26d ago
Ah good well thought out points im really learning something
20.
by jatora 26d ago
I'd suggest that they need better education then. Prompting isn't unskilled. Neither was googling before that. There is critical thinking involved, and the method in which you utilize the outputs that matters as well. Yes skills a
21.
by jatora 26d ago
Yikes. Sounds like your workflow needs a ton of work if your SWE QoL hasnt improved. that's pretty wild that youd not be optimizing
22.
by jatora 26d ago
Data center complaints existed long before AI. The stories you read about neighborhood issues are by and large for pre-existing data centers. This is not an AI issue
23.
by jatora 27d ago
who is it reducing qol for? I get that SWE get far higher benefit than maybe everyone else, but who is it actively reducing QoL for?
24.
by jatora 27d ago
Plan for your organizational wisdom to be passed down in the form of code, comments, and markdown documentation files... all for other agents with centaur orchestrators.
25.
by jatora 27d ago
More coordination is exactly what the commenter was proposing though so I dont really see the point in your response.
26.
by jatora 27d ago
Continual gains that have not stopped and there is clearly much gain to be had even if model intelligence stopped scaling. I find it borderline nasty how so many people are positively hoping for a bubble to pop or an AI winter to come so th
27.
by jatora 27d ago
It seems you're coming from the school of 'LLM's can only say what has been baked directly into their weights' This is clearly not the case. You can make up your own programming language and feed it to an LLM and it can
28.
by jatora 27d ago
Has JEPA shown a shred of viability yet?
29.
by jatora 27d ago
No, you cant. I challenge anyone who claims this to show me an actual project built only by SLM's and not using opus, sonnet, sol, or terra. Spoiler: you can't.
30.
by jatora 29d ago
You feel incorrectly

More ›