jasonlhy

32 ms·

1.
by jasonlhy 2y ago
This is more common in other fields especially in a finance domain.
2.
by jasonlhy 2y ago
I have a apple Visio pro, I personally think it is a very good device, control by finger is impressive, except it is way too expensive
3.
by jasonlhy 2y ago
I think the real difference is experts can tell you what he is good at and admits what he is not good at but imitators cannot
4.
by jasonlhy 3y ago
It have some learning curve, but it actually makes sense when you get used to it and work for other format too. It is much better than other transformation language, and you can even call Java. I think they kind of stuck in the development,
5.
by jasonlhy 3y ago
I think the best alternative for JQ is datawave, but it is not open source. https://dataweave.mulesoft.com/
6.
by jasonlhy 4y ago
It depends on your end goals, if your target is to find a job, implement some feature without going into too details. Not every people like to deals with the implementation details. Being a generalist is the road. For example, many people j
7.
by jasonlhy 6y ago
I think OOP as a way of abstraction. It make sense to abstraction something in OOP style, for example, collection such as LinkedList, Stack. But sometime it is too verbose to use OOP, for example lambda vs anonymous listener. The biggest p
8.
by jasonlhy 6y ago
I believe they tried to keep the C# version independently from the framework version, so people can use the new C# version on a old .net framework. But things seem impossible for some new features, for example async steam just need new feat
9.
by jasonlhy 6y ago
I think the value of unit test is to test the logic in software abstraction instead of relying on external dependencies, but I believe many unit test is just for the sake of unit test
10.
by jasonlhy 6y ago
I would say many examples in the book is just for demo. In real life, it have to trade off somethings
11.
by jasonlhy 6y ago
They change a lot in the build system in recent years and completely confuse people
12.
by jasonlhy 6y ago
I have colleague who still write desktop application in Delphi. I sometimes work with him and to observe how he write Delphi, which is quite impressive, and the performance is remarkable. However, it is really bad at some points. First, i
13.
by jasonlhy 6y ago
I wonder if Delphi still a one pass compiler?
14.
by jasonlhy 6y ago
I used Visual Programming in my previous job. It is pretty good for waterfall logic and certain workflow. However, it is not scalable well for custom pattern, custom architecture, and Async, operation and functional programming paradigm
15.
by jasonlhy 6y ago
I think the main reason is many developer lacks the skill of systematic learning. Never attempt to read the basic manual / document and understand the basic theory behind the technology
16.
by jasonlhy 6y ago
I think document is good for filling the details, but it will not solve all the problem . And I kind of hate Architect with an extreme authority from top to the bottom and just assume people know everything. From my experience, casual comm
17.
by jasonlhy 6y ago
I think framework is extremely abstract today. Sometimes I need to check the source code to understand what kind of magic is going on inside the framework.
18.
by jasonlhy 6y ago
Just like I asked my Team Lead to drop IE support. Even the product owner is OK with it. He is quite obsessed with IE.
19.
by jasonlhy 7y ago
Server side rendering is not really that slow, and SPA is not really that fast if your bundle size is huge. More important is that most users will not able to distinguish the difference. I have asked my friends how they feel to compare Face
20.
by jasonlhy 7y ago
I would say the biggest challenge of this kind of field is it is so big so no one actually know everything. The rule also varies between countries. For example, the construction rule in England may be different from the rule in the US
21.
by jasonlhy 7y ago
Absolutely agree, construction is very big field. I work for software company targeting construction, the scale of data, operation is far beyond my expectations
22.
by jasonlhy 7y ago
I think they are learning tools for people to start and to play around. It is hard for an application developer with no background knowledge to understand what a parser does because it is quite abstract, for example lexer, tokens and expres
23.
by jasonlhy 7y ago
It really depends on what kind of job you are targeting on. Some low end jobs can be replaced with the tool. But there is always a room for professional developers who are attention to details and are able to identity and to fix the problem
24.
by jasonlhy 7y ago
From my experience, to integrate with SAP may not be that trivial with just calling SAP’s RFC. Companies may need to workaround SAP issues, for example, user license, slow RFC response. And also need to consider the case of error recovery,
25.
by jasonlhy 7y ago
In my previous company, there is a senior worked on SAP for a long period of time. In his point of view, the UI of SAP was nice in 90s, but they are outdated now. And you can’t customise the user interface with what you want. He also thinks
26.
by jasonlhy 7y ago
OutSystems is probably the leader in this area. But you need to keep in mind that low code != easier development or faster time, it just means another tool to develop. You need to still understand how to use those tool to develop your syste
27.
by jasonlhy 7y ago
Knowing a little bit is good, building your entire career around it is bad except you work for it as a consultant.
28.
by jasonlhy 7y ago
I think VB dead just because RAD is dead just like the article states: Careless newbies, bored company workers, and summer students trampled in, solving challenges that would have been much more difficult on any other platform, and sprayin
29.
by jasonlhy 7y ago
I have used OutSystems for almost a year, I think it is almost the best in this area. But I still don’t like it in many ways. Its normal paradigm is simple imperative programming, and usually over abstraction. Some simple logic flow just ea
30.
by jasonlhy 7y ago
I absolutely agree on you, the entry level of Windows developer used to be lower than other developers. People use visual studio to drag and drop the controls, glue the code all together. You don’t need to type command, you don’t need to un

More ›