jarrelscy

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by jarrelscy 2y ago

   No problem! Thanks for picking it up.
2. 2.▲
   by jarrelscy 2y ago

   Thanks for the comments. I’m well aware as I’m also a practicing radiologist! Some hospitals in Australia where I work do a good job of enforcing that radiology orders are sent with the appropriate metadata but I agree that is not the case
3. 3.▲
   by jarrelscy 2y ago

   Agreed, updated at https://harrison.ai/harrison-rad-1/
4. 4.▲
   by jarrelscy 2y ago

   Developer of the model here. We built this model in the form of an LLM precisely to address this problem - to be able to utilize the textual data that accompanies the image such as the order history or clinical background e.g. patient demog
5. 5.▲
   by jarrelscy 2y ago

   Developer here - its a good point that most of the models were not specifically trained on diagnostic imaging, with the exception of Llava-Med. We would love to compare against other models trained on diagnostic imaging if anyone can grant
6. 6.▲
   by jarrelscy 2y ago

   This current model is radiographs alone. The FRCR 2B Rapids exam is based on only radiographs.
7. 7.▲
   by jarrelscy 2y ago

   One of the developers here. The paper links to an earlier model from a different group that could only interpret X-rays of specific body parts. Our model does not have such limitation. However, the actual FRCR 2B Rapids exam question bank i