janober

5 ms·

1.
by janober 7mo ago
Really cool initiative, excited to be part of it!
2.
by janober 11mo ago
Thanks a lot! And all fine. I know there is a lot of that going on out there. So, I can not blame you at all.
3.
by janober 11mo ago
Definitely, no stars have been bought, and none will ever be. It would go literally against everything we stand for and one of our core values, "Act with Integrity".
4.
by janober 2y ago
Also love my roast: Oh, look at Mr. 'I automate everything' over here! You're so obsessed with workflow automation, I bet you've tried to create an n8n node to brush your teeth. Your GitHub feed is like a 'Who'
5.
Show HN: Self-Hosted AI Starter Kit(github.com)
21 points by janober 2y ago|1 comments
6.
by janober 2y ago
Sure happy to chat. I will send you an email.
7.
by janober 2y ago
Yes, I definitely missed a lot there. An email, to make me aware of those discussions would have probably made quite a difference. Anyway, it sounds like it would potentially not have changed much of a difference considering you are also pr
8.
by janober 2y ago
Yes, I totally agree that I should have been more involved in hindsight, and that is definitely on me! In the first conversation with Chad, we actually agreed on chatting again after a few weeks regarding the next steps, but that never happ
9.
by janober 2y ago
Honestly generally love it. Not surprising, after all, are we at n8n Fair Code licensed ourselves(not to be confused with Fair Source). I would, however, really love it if it ended up being more inclusive and so in a joint effort rather tha
10.
by janober 2y ago
Probably worth checking out: https://www.hanko.io/ "Open source auth management for the passkey era"
11.
by janober 3y ago
fyi, a separate account should not be necessary any more as the functionality got integrated into the regular version and is so available for all users by default.
12.
Building LLM powered apps with n8n and LangChain(n8n.io)
3 points by janober 3y ago|0 comments
13.
by janober 3y ago
Totally understandable. We have however basic user management in n8n for quite a while already and it is available for free. Since the beginning of the year we also have built collaboration, that is however a paid feature.
14.
by janober 3y ago
Docker is actually not a requirement. You can also run it directly with npm. You can even start it for testing (when you have npm installed) simply by typing "npx n8n".
15.
by janober 3y ago
Source available does sadly not really mean that much. Just means the source code is available. MIT licensed code and code you can see but are not allowed to use can be described as source available. That is what https://faircode
16.
by janober 4y ago
Ah yes, that is what we did in the end for the database. But that is not our main issue, rather that we do not get any more instances for our k8s cluster and those we can sadly not just spin up somewhere else.
17.
by janober 4y ago
Years?!?! Guess I then have to be happy that in our case it is "just" around 4 months.
18.
by janober 4y ago
Thanks a lot. Yes that is also something we are trying in parallel.
19.
by janober 4y ago
We actually use Azure for ~2 years now. It worked the most time reasonably well, even though we had also a few issues. But our current issue + ready your and other comments will probably result in looking for a new home.
20.
by janober 4y ago
Thanks a lot! Just checked internally. Apparently are there some instances which we could get but would not work cost wise (have for example a lot of CPUs but we mainly care about RAM). Additionally, is there also still a region-wide CPU li
21.
by janober 4y ago
Could be possible. But as far as I know would two accounts in the same data center not work for us for technical reasons.
22.
by janober 4y ago
Thanks a lot! That is always great to hear!
23.
by janober 4y ago
Yes, some are possible and we are already doing that. Sadly will it only delay the time we run out of resources. If we would talk about a few weeks, we could for sure make it, but over 4 months is sadly not possible.
24.
by janober 4y ago
It has actually been done that way. For technical reasons is sadly a move to a new data center even with that very complicated and time consuming.
25.
by janober 4y ago
Actually nothing fancy, for sure no GPUs. Just Standard_E4s_v4.
26.
by janober 4y ago
Sorry, missed that. No, we do not.
27.
by janober 4y ago
Thanks a lot, that is very helpful and great to know! Def. something we will do in the future.
28.
by janober 4y ago
Very interesting. As mentioned in another post, I am sure they are not trying to screw us or anybody else up. Is after all for sure not in their interest. But not flagging that to users I do not get at all. I would expect to get at least a
29.
by janober 4y ago
I am still 100% sure it was exactly the right decision. Was however in hindsight probably the right one to choose Azure and/or that data center.
30.
by janober 4y ago
We already tried to push Microsoft, sadly have they been not very helpful. Still trying to get in contact with somebody that can actually make a difference. After all, are we also not asking for a hundred machines. Can really not imagine th

More ›