jannotti

8 ms·

1.
by jannotti 4y ago
I get where you're coming from - this response seemed overly harsh. But I do think there's an important difference - this petition is anonymous and criticizes three people by name. Armstrong's response criticizes nobody by n
2.
by jannotti 6y ago
Really frustrating that three consecutive comments just claim "not as good, "same", "not as good". Would it be so hard to name a particular feature that matters to you when saying Signal is lacking? Otherwise what&
3.
by jannotti 6y ago
Grubbhub, Seamless, Eat24, Foodler, DiningIn. They were all around and fairly large by then. But they didn't go big on spending VC money, so over time DoorDash wins. Pretty interesting, however it turns out.
4.
by jannotti 6y ago
That was AOL / Time Warner, right?
5.
by jannotti 6y ago
I appreciate your measured response. I certainly had not dug deep into these daily 3X funds, as the daily/drag aspect seemed (seems?) clearly a problem. But, I can't just pretend the 10yr history of UPRO doesn't exist. I&#x
6.
by jannotti 6y ago
Please stay away from leverage equity index funds. https://capitalallocatorspodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2017... Edit: For more clarity - risk parity can make sense, but I don't think you ever need to use l
7.
by jannotti 6y ago
All of them. I’d say that’s the biggest problem recoil is addressing.
8.
by jannotti 6y ago
If food delivery and ride hailing continue to experience inverse demand relationships, there's a pretty big synergy here in being able to keep your drivers (oops, I mean the independent business owners you've contracted with) busy
9.
by jannotti 6y ago
I get the feeling, but I rarely think "I'm completely done now, time to comment!" Better to admit that and document a bit earlier than when it's "finished".
10.
by jannotti 6y ago
"Banning a book" colloquially means that nobody is allowed to read that book, it conjures images of book burnings and the gestapo searching your house for contraband. "Banning" a repo here means, "Github is not off
11.
by jannotti 6y ago
Sharepoint has an uncertain future? I had never heard of it a year ago, but as I got to know the "enterprise" space, it seems every large company is heavily invested in it. What might replace the need to share documents across a
12.
by jannotti 6y ago
Well, you did say you didn't finish it. So would it surprise you to learn that topic is addressed directly?
13.
by jannotti 6y ago
Title might be: Coronavirus Crisis Shows Marijuana Is ‘Essential’ and Pays High Taxes
14.
by jannotti 6y ago
I think this does a good job of presenting the financial issues properly without too much rhetoric. The most important point was that if these corporations need a bailout to survive, then the stockholders have already lost their money. The
15.
by jannotti 7y ago
Then you'd probably still want this switch, but expect to be notified of the block. Then you could move in an orderly fashion.
16.
by jannotti 7y ago
Viaweb was founded in 1995 and sold in 1998. It WAS part of the first bubble. And no, people were not routinely writing web server based "applications" in 1995. They were, at best, making some early websites. Also nobody was t
17.
by jannotti 7y ago
They also used to say you needed to do this if you "exclusively" used third party sign on. Now it's if you use third party sign on at all.
18.
by jannotti 7y ago
That's true, though I often forget it. But surely those cracker-jack security expert HTML writers don't forget! Or use such privacy insensitive tools as the ones you've mentioned.
19.
by jannotti 7y ago
It's another function though, surely harder to reach for than the normal search. What's the value in bifurcating your searching process? What do you gain?
20.
by jannotti 7y ago
I mean, he had to learn to read too. If not for that, he'd never have founded viaweb! True, but not very interesting. I happen to think both were fairly innovative. Both viaweb and YC were at the forefront of a newish idea that seems
21.
by jannotti 7y ago
Yes, please say more. I've been idly looking that these both from a distance and I would not have expected differences along that dimension. I would expect the expose nearly identical GQL types from the same pg schema.
22.
by jannotti 7y ago
One difference is that today's page anchors are only put there by the page author, so, since all authors are cracker-jack security experts, they would not have made an anchor available in such a sensitive part of the document, since it
23.
by jannotti 7y ago
I thought that was a strange takeaway for the article to take. His analysis was correct . He was undone by a factor he didn't even contemplate. His confidence in his "analysis" was spot on. There's definitely a lesso
24.
by jannotti 7y ago
Searching visually? Yes, 100k would be impossible. But then, even one year's worth would be impossible. So you're surely using your editor's search function, and that's definitely fast enough to not care whether you&#
25.
by jannotti 7y ago
Doesn't taking a picture of the whole page at once and then having it read to you after OCR dominate this in every way, from ease of input (from the page) to flexibility of output (to the human)?
26.
by jannotti 7y ago
Yeah, it's weird that I find code formatted by black much less aesthetically pleasing than js code from prettier. But we're still using it.
27.
by jannotti 7y ago
There is no way mass-market phones are giving up on the camera that allows for video conferencing / FaceTime. Don't trivialize the utility by calling it the "selfie" camera. And don't claim you've confirmed it
28.
by jannotti 7y ago
You say "next to no one" but I certainly feel the same way, and his comment was the highest voted. So...
29.
by jannotti 7y ago
I wonder how many of them are independent founders being facetious. They might be, literally, a software enegineer who is "at" wework.
30.
by jannotti 7y ago
Could you say more about each, with a couple examples? I find myself building little CLIs all the time, yet haven't developed any real intuition about what makes a good one.

More ›