Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jamghee
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
by
jamghee
2y ago
Has anyone put something together like this yet? Would be a very interesting read.
2.
▲
Generating code was never the hard part
(nick.scialli.me)
11 points
by
jamghee
3y ago
|
2 comments
3.
▲
Targeted strategies over dogmatic best practices
(nick.scialli.me)
3 points
by
jamghee
3y ago
|
1 comments
4.
▲
Software Testing Observations and Recommendations
(nick.scialli.me)
1 points
by
jamghee
3y ago
|
0 comments
5.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
Ah, that is an interesting tactic. I think I'd be worried there's some 0.0001% chance Amazon would find out and ask for all the money back.
6.
▲
Ask HN: Where do you go to find recommendations for physical programming books?
1 points
by
jamghee
3y ago
|
2 comments
7.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
>Did your laptop selection site just replicate the data from Amazon, or did it try and do something novel? I thought it was novel. It was basically a guided questionnaire that asked you about your needs and price point and then spit out
8.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
I assume this is using some kind of amazon pricing API under the hood. Does anyone know how to get access to that kind of API without already being a successful affiliate?
9.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
I think the columns could use some basic sorting, but otherwise yes
10.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
That wasn't the issue I had at the time. I had the required disclaimers but they still rejected me because the sole purpose of my site was to sell their products.
11.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
I'm a bit surprised Amazon allowed this page to do affiliate marketing like this. I had a similar page but much more generalized to laptops and they told me my site had to have some other content: it couldn't just exist to promote
12.
▲
Deceptive Deprecation: The Truth About NPM Deprecated Packages
(blog.aquasec.com)
2 points
by
jamghee
3y ago
|
1 comments
13.
▲
In-code TODOs without tickets don't usually get done
(nick.scialli.me)
2 points
by
jamghee
3y ago
|
0 comments
14.
▲
In-code TODOs are just documentation of tech debt
(nick.scialli.me)
2 points
by
jamghee
3y ago
|
0 comments
15.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
I working in XP for a bit and the constant pair programming aspect was simply too fatiguing for me. I enjoy pairing every now and then on certain problems, but the constant presence of another person left me utterly drained at the end of ev
16.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
I get frustrated by articles like this that use words like "hit" or "impact" or "affect." I've learned nothing. What will be the effect?
17.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
Almost spit out my coffee at that, thanks
18.
▲
A tech lead self-assessment
(nick.scialli.me)
4 points
by
jamghee
3y ago
|
0 comments
19.
▲
Are Nitpicks Worth It?
(nick.scialli.me)
4 points
by
jamghee
3y ago
|
1 comments
20.
▲
Source code for a 1977 version of Zork
(github.com)
71 points
by
jamghee
3y ago
|
23 comments
21.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
>The FAA said the inspections will take between four and eight hours per plane. Seems reasonable. I was wondering if a single event should really be enough to "ground" all similar planes, but seems like they just want to do a q
22.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
OP's solution isn't remote code execution though. It's all in-browser, which is why it's pretty cool. Assuming you're only running code that the client themselves are providing, you're in pretty good shape from
23.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
There may be some middle ground where the download starts when you click in a text editor, or hover over the "run" button
24.
▲
Solutions over Best Practices
(nick.scialli.me)
3 points
by
jamghee
3y ago
|
1 comments
25.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
Wow: >This is not the happiest message I have posted on the Forum, but hopefully we will be back shortly. 11 Jun 2010
26.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
Wow, how does a wikipedia page on this exist?
27.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
Congrats on HN post success. Did you get any criticism? How did you handle it? That's my biggest concern with writing and sharing more on the internet: people can be pretty darn ruthless when they don't agree with you.
28.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
Yes would work just fine
29.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
I don't think I'm the intended audience for this. I don't particularly want to build the foundations of tomorrow. I want to enjoy a comfortable life with my family. If I get to write some fun software along the way then that&
30.
▲
by
jamghee
3y ago
Was Fusebox a predecessor to ColdBox?
More ›