Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jahav
searching Neon…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
1.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CONS... Important bits (10c and around): * Libraries/non-end products are fine, unless monetized. * Employee contributions seem to be fine. *
2.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
That is already part of CRA: > It is of particular importance for manufacturers to ensure that their products do not contain vulnerable components developed by third parties. > Manufacturers shall, upon identifying a vulnerability in
3.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
It's called tidelift.com
4.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
First, I like how you included “popular” adjective. That alone disqualifies 99% of projects. These are the projects “hacked” by non-paid devs. Second, some proof would be nice. I live in .net/nugget ecosystem and other than libraries b
5.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
That is one of them, here is the second version with different amendedments by European Council: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-11726-2023-... They are now hashing out a final consolidated versio
6.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
TBF there is a lot of things “free of charge” connected to commercial activity, e.g. Android, .NET Core, MongoDb, ElasticSearch, even RedHat with Linux … I understand need to somehow include them, but the line should be at the for-profit co
7.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
You are asking how requiring open source with no money to satisfy plethora of regulations along with legal liability (I.e. making it a commercial grade) makes it less likely for open source be made? Ask log4j or OpenSSL. Go read this: http
8.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
There is some hope for individual developers in EP amended version https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/plmrep/COM... article 10c: > Developers contributing individually to free and open-sourc
9.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
> it’s called professional accountability Professional does for money, by definition. That doesn’t apply for most open source. RedHat employee contributing to Linux kernel is an exception, not a rule.
10.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
To put it bluntly, it means a significant risk when creating any open source project. It’s a common knowledge that there is no money in open source, but suddenly I am liable. Half of open source licenses is disclaimer of liability. Also a l
11.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
1. Reproduction is already heavily subsidized in many countries, be it direct grants, tax breats and so on. This is nothing new. 2. Most people actually want children. Getting someone to actually procreate with that will share burden. 3. In
12.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
That assumes that new humans can be only by women. There is no reason, why artificial womb, possibly with multiple selection box for genes, is not a very realistic possibility, along with state funded child rearing services. (see Norway)
13.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
Maybe, but normal developer interracts with sane parts. Honestly, the biggest problem with git is sane environment for merge conflicts and that is out of scope of git CLI. In most cases, imposing rule for small PRs/feature branches wil
14.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
MS stores windows codebase in a single repo ( https://devblogs.microsoft.com/bharry/the-largest-git-repo-o... ). 300GB. I don't really see a benefit of having all code of an org in a single repo. Single product, sur
15.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
Rather surprising that they don't offer sign up with Facebook/Google. I know, i know, but that's pretty big speed bump in the onboarding process.
16.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
Probably, but I will take this victory. Google has power to make this happen.
17.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
Because they are collecting a shitload of data about me to make them work. It's like a little camera accompanying you everywhere and you don't get to say no and it's used for anything they can get away with.
18.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
Maybe when uutils ship their gnu compatible version(deviations from GNU are considered bugs), macos will update. MIT, Rust, active development... Maybe in few years.
19.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
I suspect such versions won't comply with Cyber Resilience Act (=company would be on hook for a fine). Browsers are in category 2 iirc. Edit: rest of world might be fine(big maybe, these things have tendency to proliferate),eu citizens
20.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
You can try to patent anything, but patent might not be accepted. The thing is that patent office is funded by patent fees, so there is an incentive to accept the patent plus they are often hard to read.
21.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
Huawei and HarmonyOS? I know, rather unpopular ouside of China.
22.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
Sure, but position of Intel back then was very different than today. Being dethroned and free cash flow negative is rather bad I am told.
23.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
> For example you can get Chrome-style updates where Windows will keep the app fresh in the background even if it's not running Considering the ability to update itself is a requirement of Cyber Resilience Act in EU, I foresee a big
24.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
Check out the full changes file, it has dates of changes: https://www.ghisler.com/history1100.txt Even after 30 years there are still things to fix pretty much every day. Maintenance is really endless task
25.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
Two panels + fast keyboard navigation across directories is big for me. I like the overview, speed and simplicity. File Explorer is just ... nope. I am sure there are other programs, like Double Commander or maybe Salamander Commander if it
26.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
Spoken like a person who never even touched it even on a small project. No cookies... so no language preferences. That is a profile cookie. Right to erasure. What about invoices and orders? When can it be anonymous and when is it old enough
27.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
> MozJPEG is a patch for libjpeg-turbo. Please send pull requests to libjpeg-turbo if the changes aren't specific to newly-added MozJPEG-only compression code. https://github.com/mozilla/mozjpeg#mozilla-jpeg-enc
28.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
Llc stands for limited liability company. Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. Thw method to remove limit unlimited liability is at the core of our economical system. We are
29.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
I am shocked! shocked! Well, not that shocked. Still, don't heat stuff for the infants in a plastic.
30.
▲
by
jahav
3y ago
He likely means that companies will use the software and create issues with their problems without contributing anything back = developer will be free support for companies making money with no benefit. AGPL doesn't have such problems
More ›