j45

12 ms·

1.
by j45 4d ago
I wonder if for anyone it seems like the more agentic LLMs get, the more difficult some things have gotten or going a certain route more often in responses, compared to running a similar task on - a local model?
2.
by j45 4d ago
Always, and only use an external device for streaming services, never the software built into the TV. Apple TV, Android TV or other devices are perfectly capable and better integrate with mobile and other devices in your network. The tradeo
3.
by j45 4d ago
Both are unacceptably egregious and done for zero benefit of the customer and a disproportionate and asymmetric benefit for the manufacturer. I've been trying to learn how to secure LG TVs, and saw that some people do seem to jailbreak
4.
by j45 4d ago
Regardless of it being how it always was done, such a finger print can easily be injected into LG's advertising ecosystem to infer everything about your demographic and what your interests and income might be and hit you with more spec
5.
by j45 4d ago
There will always be a faster technology, regardless of what it's called.
6.
by j45 4d ago
Appreciate the post. Want to clarify that lazy and ai spamming on LinkedIn is lame, especially for non-tech sales people selling technology. Also, b2b sales can be foreign to most people - when i've done b2b sales on linkedin it's
7.
by j45 4d ago
Just because someone says something on the internet doesn't mean it's true. It's critical to do the CBT or other work to remind ourselves of this. There is no real get rich scheme. Someone might have 10-15 years of experienc
8.
by j45 4d ago
Seeing the word pacing applied pacing to non-deterministic ai model development feels like imagining the "pace" of the cutting edge frontier growth will be fuzzy, like non-deterministic llms.
9.
by j45 4d ago
Leaving TVs disconnected from the internet is the only way to ignore this. Connect your own devices and smarts to it. A broader issue is that it does any kind of recording, or processing of the signals around the tv (from a microphone) or
10.
by j45 4d ago
The "agentic" stuff has come a long way recently, it's worth revisiting it every few months, it is better and better at taking on the tedium especially.
11.
by j45 5d ago
It will be fun to try and deterministically define sloppiness relative to a tool that is not deterministic. Of course, sloppiness to date can be measured by different shared and interpreted preferences and definitions.
12.
by j45 6d ago
Its interesting that the move is back to native and not towards a technology better suited to delivering the same experience on multiple devices from one codebase.
13.
by j45 6d ago
Beautifully articulated. Software that is not about the user and more about the developers or the providers struggles with alignment and optimizing for the outcomes of the user instead of their own.
14.
by j45 7d ago
Helping more beginners might upset some who have put in the labor. Over time many things become easier to learn and do, and those who might feel upset should make sure their own feet are moving as well in terms of their learning and growing
15.
by j45 8d ago
Many views are welcome, but if the table doesn't include someone literate with tech as well, it can drift away like LLM chats uniquely do. It can help, but where they don't understand the possibilities and capabilities of tech in
16.
by j45 9d ago
I wonder if this applies to large LG Monitors too.
17.
by j45 11d ago
I would agree contangion is a much better word. Social Contagions can be memes, plus doom scrolling or anything.
18.
by j45 11d ago
I'll clarify in case it helps - need everyone at the table, not just only tech (or non-tech only) as you may be assuming. Technology takes without a tech perspective present can greatly skew it. I'm not referring to a technology c
19.
by j45 11d ago
Desires only tend to magnify in intensity and multiply in numbers because there is rarely enough. Working on desire is a big thing.
20.
by j45 11d ago
Nicely said. Having dependencies or needs is one thing, having them managed for relative minimal impact on one's time might be another way to look at it for some.
21.
by j45 11d ago
Have to take commentary by non tech folks speaking about tech with a grain of salt and perspective since the tech is changing so fast both in capability and application. Research can be more of a lagging indicator than a leading indicator w
22.
by j45 11d ago
Great another economist post of non-technology people talking about tech. That's worked great for the datacenter misinformation so far. There's not even an author on this article. But you can listen to an ai narrated version of it
23.
by j45 12d ago
If things are still being discovered, it feels like a little like the observation and eval layers are missing when this was sent out as a free for all.
24.
by j45 12d ago
Brutal. How are other platforms solving this without disproportionate resources?
25.
by j45 15d ago
It could also be a balance between more words being less effort per.. token, etc.
26.
by j45 15d ago
This is not a great look for what is likely shoddy AI application affecting a free/open source/non-profit project. Google's AI can't even line up the facts of it's own TOS as laid out in the ticket. If it's co
27.
by j45 16d ago
My understanding was part of the definition was changed thereby recategorizing Pluto?
28.
by j45 16d ago
It not only about it being an expensive setup (or not), and also other considerations: - There's no guarantee of the $20/month service, and it likely has some limits compared to dedicated hardware token wise. - Model are becoming
29.
by j45 16d ago
It will be interesting to see how much further (or not) some open source projects like this can get using meaningful AI driven development.
30.
by j45 17d ago
Politicians and the interests around them just don't quit.

More ›