itsnotabtmoney

7 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by itsnotabtmoney 3y ago

   We know that Youtube can put their fingers on the scales of their algorithm, and that they do. It's probably a single variable like `multiplier` in their hotness formula that is a default of 1.00. Lex Fridman gets insane reach beyond t
2. 2.▲
   by itsnotabtmoney 3y ago

   This post treats the constant stream of "new public intellectuals" as some kind of organic, natural phenomenon. It's not, these people reach the top of your YouTube feed because someone wants them there. There's nothing
3. 3.▲
   by itsnotabtmoney 3y ago

   What do you think they do with the stolen cars, just keep them for themselves and use them to commute to their day job? The fences buying the cars (or ones leading the crime rings) sure have money.
4. 4.▲
   by itsnotabtmoney 3y ago

   Why isn't it the city's responsibility to prevent criminals from being able to commit crime? There are plenty of cities in the world with less than 1% of the car theft rate of these cities suing. It's hilarious to blame an au
5. 5.▲
   by itsnotabtmoney 3y ago

   > The safest business decision would be to remain neutral, respond to law enforcement requests if presented with one, and otherwise do the job you're paid to do. Have you considered that it might not be about money? What if the deci